Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;5:11. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00011

Table 5.

The performance of estimated FDR methods for window-based rare variant tests, using three different methods for estimation.

Analytic strategy Identification of windows containing causal variants Identification of windows either containing causal variants, or correlated with such windows at r ≥ 0.90
Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) Beta-uniform mixture (BUM) FDRtool Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) Beta-uniform mixture (BUM) FDRtool
N—All 0.981 (0.033) 0.982 (0.030) 0.982 (0.030) 0.935 (0.080) 0.925 (0.088) 0.936 (0.079)
N—Strat 0.980 (0.036) 0.980 (0.042) 0.980 (0.036) 0.952 (0.049) 0.944 (0.056) 0.953 (0.049)
P—All 0.974 (0.064) 0.970 (0.107) 0.975 (0.060) 0.925 (0.096) 0.911 (0.130) 0.927 (0.091)
P—Strat 0.971 (0.075) 0.970 (0.073) 0.972 (0.075) 0.943 (0.078) 0.932 (0.087) 0.943 (0.078)
S—All 0.927 (0.038) 0.927 (0.037) 0.920 (0.040) 0.874 (0.046) 0.858 (0.046) 0.862 (0.045)
S—Strat 0.927 (0.037) 0.926 (0.038) 0.920 (0.040) 0.882 (0.045) 0.868 (0.045) 0.872 (0.046)

Results show the proportion of windows containing no causal variants (tFDR) for an estimated FDR of 0.05. Results are shown for the simulation with σ = 0.5. Results are the mean across 100 simulations (standard deviation).