Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2013 Jul-Aug;10(4):1080–1085. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.99

Table 1.

Comparing the clustering methods using functional annotations.

Method Boxplots of cluster sizes # Clusters # Genes
clustered		 % Clustered
genes
belonging to
same GO
slim# 		% Clustered
genes
belonging to
same
selected GO
terms$
Linear average linkage graphic file with name nihms519544t1.jpg 50 4502 26.5% 14.4%
MI average linkage 54 4565 25.6% 13.9%
GDHC2 (cluster profile) 48 4585 25.7% 13.8%
GDHC1 average linkage 42 4659 28.5% 15.9%
#

Limited to GO slim terms with 2000 or less yeast genes assigned. Percentage between random gene pairs: 22.6%.

$

Percentage between random gene pairs: 11.0%