Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov-Dec;29(6):1439–1443. doi: 10.12669/pjms.296.3724

Table-II.

Summary of comparisons based on different genotypes

Sample size
No. of Test of association
Study case control studies OR (95% CI) Z P value
AA + AG vs. GG Overall 1529 2399 10 1.62 (1.23 – 2.12) 3.47 0.0005
Asian 908 784 5 1.87 (1.20 – 2.91) 2.78 0.005
Caucasian 621 1615 5 1.41 (1.02 – 1.94) 2.08 0.04
AA vs. AG + GG Overall 1252 2188 9 1.48 (1.02 – 2.15) 2.09 0.04
Asian 631 573 4 1.42 (0.92 – 3.26) 1.69 0.09
Caucasian 621 1615 5 1.31 (0.79 – 2.18) 1.05 0.29
AA vs. GG Overall 685 1216 9 1.77 (1.11 – 2.82) 2.41 0.02
Asian 366 343 4 2.14 (0.96 – 4.81) 1.85 0.06
Caucasian 319 873 5 1.53 (0.82 – 2.86) 1.33 0.18
AG vs. GG Overall 999 1885 9 1.37 (1.14 – 1.64) 3.43 0.0006
Asian 461 453 4 1.36 (1.04 – 1.78) 2.26 0.02
Caucasian 538 1432 5 1.37 (1.08 – 1.75) 2.58 0.01
A vs. G Overall 2504 4376 9 1.40 (1.10 – 1.78) 2.72 0.006
Asian 1262 1146 4 1.60 (1.00 – 2.57) 1.97 0.05
Caucasian 1242 3230 5 1.27 (0.96 – 1.68) 1.70 0.09