Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;31(4):446–454. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i4.19992

Table 3.

Results from multiple linear regression models that evaluated the effect of type of protein intake on specific blood biomarkers (Results are presented as β-coefficients±SE, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) (n=490)

Parameter Cystatin C, mg/dL Haemoglobin, g/dL Haematocrit, %
β±SE 95% CI β±SE 95% CI β±SE 95% CI
Model 1: Animal protein intake (haem), % of total energy -1.44±0.15 (-0.010, 0.001) 0.09±0.02 (0.04, 0.13) 0.27±0.07 (0.14, 0.40)
Model 2: #1+Age and sex -0.0002±0.003 (-0.005, 0.005) 0.04±0.02 (0.005, 0.08) 0.15±0.05 (0.04, 0.25)
Model 3: #2+BMI, smoking, and physical activity -0.0007±0.003 (-0.006, 0.004) 0.04±0.02 (0.004, 0.08) 0.14±0.05 (0.04, 0.24)
Model 4: #3+Alcohol and MedDietScore -0.001±0.003 (-0.006, 0.004) 0.04±0.02 (0.006, 0.08) 0.15±0.05 (0.04, 0.25)
Triglycerides, mg/dL Iron, μg/dL Haemoglobin, g/dL Haematocrit, %
β±SE 95% CI β±SE 95% CI β±SE 95% CI β±SE 95% CI
Model 1: Animal protein intake (non-haem), % of total energy -0.03±0.03 (-0.08, 0.02) -0.05±0.02 (-0.09, -0.008) -0.32±0.07 (-0.44, -0.19) -0.93±0.18 (-1.3, -0.57)
Model 2: #1+Age and sex -0.03±0.02 (-0.08, 0.02) -0.03±0.02 (-0.07, 0.01) -0.08±0.05 (-0.19, 0.02) -0.27±0.15 (-0.57, 0.02)
Model 3: #2+BMI, smoking and physical activity -0.02±0.02 (-0.06, 0.03) -0.03±0.02 (-0.07, 0.01) -0.07±0.05 (-0.18, 0.03) -0.24±0.15 (-0.53, 0.05)
Model 4: #3+Alcohol and MedDietScore -0.02±0.02 (-0.06, 0.03) -0.02±0.02 (-0.06, 0.02) -0.08±0.05 (-0.18, 0.03) -0.25±0.15 (-0.55, 0.04)
Platelets, 10^3/μL
β±SE 95% CI
Model 1: Plant protein intake, % of total energy -12±4.0 (-20, -4.1)
Model 2: #1+Age and sex -11±4.0 (-18, -2.9)
Model 3: #2+BMI, smoking and physical activity -9.0±3.9 (-17, -1.3)
Model 4: #3+Alcohol and MedDietScore -6.4±4.4 (-15, 2.2)

Triglycerides and blood iron concentrations were log-transformed; Standard error