Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 5;41(22):10593–10604. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt808

Table 1.

Parameters determined from analysis

DNA Tm (°C) P (nm) PManning (nm) γ0 (base/turn) C (× 10−19 erg-cm) Pt (nm)
1 87.1 ± 0.5 51.5 ± 0.2 51.5 10.52 ± 0.01 2.27 ± 0.11 55.7 ± 2.6
2 85.3 ± 0.6 45.4 ± 0.4 10.47 ± 0.01 2.30 ± 0.13 56.5 ± 3.1
3 93.3 ± 0.7 42.9 ± 0.3 10.62 ± 0.01 3.07 ± 0.19 75.4 ± 4.7
4 91.5 ± 0.7 44.3 ± 0.1 38.1 10.62 ± 0.01 1.48 ± 0.05 36.4 ± 1.2
5 88.3 ± 0.3 41.8 ± 0.1 10.69 ± 0.01 0.85 ± 0.04 20.9 ± 1.0
6 86.5 ± 0.7 41.8 ± 0.1 64.6 10.51 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.03 14.9 ± 0.8
7 93.4 ± 0.3 50.3 ± 0.1 10.64 ± 0.01 1.09 ± 0.07 26.8 ± 1.6
8 86.8 ± 0.4 58.5 ± 0.2 58.1 10.57 ± 0.01 1.08 ± 0.08 26.5 ± 1.9
9 93.0 ± 0.5 49.5 ± 0.2 10.58 ± 0.01 3.24 ± 0.07 79.6 ± 1.8

The reported values of Tm from thermal denaturation of modified DNAs are the mean and standard deviation from three independent repeats. P, γ0 and C along with the related Pt are presented as mean ± standard deviation from Monte Carlo simulations. Manning’s theoretical charge-stiffness prediction for persistence length (PManning) is shown for comparison (11).