Table 2. 4-year cost-effectiveness of the MTCT of syphilis elimination program compared to current screening and treatment in 8 country scenarios.
Country scenario* | Cost-effectiveness findings ** | |||||||
Scenario | Syphilis prevalence in ANC | Current ANC screening & treatment coverage | Cost of health services | DALYs averted (4 years) | Cost of intervention (4 years) | Offsetting savings***(4 years) | Net cost/savingŝ | Cost per DALY averted |
A | High | Low | Low | 93,484 | $4,329,722 | $6,272,739 | −$1,943,017 | <$0 |
B | High | Low | High | 93,484 | $5,381,458 | $17,642,708 | −$12,261,250 | <$0 |
C | High | High | Low | 34,518 | $6,629,636 | $7,395,199 | −$765,563 | <$0 |
D | High | High | High | 34,518 | $8,235,796 | $12,823,574 | −$4,587,778 | <$0 |
E | Low | Low | Low | 15,584 | $4,142,287 | $2,405,480 | $1,736,807 | $111 |
F | Low | Low | High | 15,584 | $5,190,243 | $4,646,771 | $543,472 | $35 |
G | Low | High | Low | 5,754 | $6,327,564 | $5,734,376 | $593,188 | $103 |
H | Low | High | High | 5,754 | $7,927,633 | $7,787,351 | $140,282 | $24 |
Costs are in 2010 USD
Scenario classifications are: prevalence of syphilis = high (3%) or low (0.5%), current ANC screening and treatment coverage = high (70%) or low (20%), cost of health services reflects assumptions about the overall relative health care cost structure, including the cost of MTCT of syphilis AOs, i.e. high (1) or low (0.25) based on WHO CHOICE data (http://www.who.int/choice/en/).
Cost and effectiveness compared to current screening and treatment services
Offsetting savings = costs of net averted MTCT of syphilis and net averted adult STI plus costs of current services replaced by expanded program
? Savings denoted by negative costs