Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e87510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087510

Table 2. 4-year cost-effectiveness of the MTCT of syphilis elimination program compared to current screening and treatment in 8 country scenarios.

Country scenario* Cost-effectiveness findings **
Scenario Syphilis prevalence in ANC Current ANC screening & treatment coverage Cost of health services DALYs averted (4 years) Cost of intervention (4 years) Offsetting savings***(4 years) Net cost/savingŝ Cost per DALY averted
A High Low Low 93,484 $4,329,722 $6,272,739 −$1,943,017 <$0
B High Low High 93,484 $5,381,458 $17,642,708 −$12,261,250 <$0
C High High Low 34,518 $6,629,636 $7,395,199 −$765,563 <$0
D High High High 34,518 $8,235,796 $12,823,574 −$4,587,778 <$0
E Low Low Low 15,584 $4,142,287 $2,405,480 $1,736,807 $111
F Low Low High 15,584 $5,190,243 $4,646,771 $543,472 $35
G Low High Low 5,754 $6,327,564 $5,734,376 $593,188 $103
H Low High High 5,754 $7,927,633 $7,787,351 $140,282 $24

Costs are in 2010 USD

*

Scenario classifications are: prevalence of syphilis  =  high (3%) or low (0.5%), current ANC screening and treatment coverage  =  high (70%) or low (20%), cost of health services reflects assumptions about the overall relative health care cost structure, including the cost of MTCT of syphilis AOs, i.e. high (1) or low (0.25) based on WHO CHOICE data (http://www.who.int/choice/en/).

**

Cost and effectiveness compared to current screening and treatment services

***

Offsetting savings  =  costs of net averted MTCT of syphilis and net averted adult STI plus costs of current services replaced by expanded program

? Savings denoted by negative costs