Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: PM R. 2013 Jun 28;5(11):931–938. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.06.006

Table 4.

Table 4a: Distribution of Number Of Sites With Latent Trigger Points
Group No. of Latent Sites
Frequency* 0 1 2 3 Total
Active Group 10 9 4 1 24
No Pain Group 20 1 4 0 25
Total 30 10 8 1 49
Frequency Missing = 1
Table 4 b: Distribution of Number of Normal Sites
Group No. of Normal Sites
Frequency** 0 1 2 3 4 Total
Active Group 1 7 14 2 0 24
No Pain Group 0 0 4 1 20 25
Total 1 7 18 3 20 49
Frequency Missing = 1
*

A greater percentage of subjects in the ‘Active’ group have one latent site compared to the ‘Np’ group. (p=0.0062)

**

A greater percentage of subjects have four normal sites in the ‘Np’ group compared to the ‘A’ group. (p<0.0001).