Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 0 1):279–287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094

Table 1.

Patient characteristics between women who developed de novo SUI after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and women who did not in the Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair andMidurethral Slingtria. (2)

Positive SUI Negative SUI

Variable n* Mean ± SD or n (%) n* Mean ± SD or n (%)
Age at Surgery 115 62.26 ± 9.75 341 63.85 ± 10.25
Race 115 342
    White 98(85%) 300 (88%)
    Black 8(7%) 19 (6%)
    Other 9 (8%) 23 (6%)
Parity 114 3.11 ± 1.98 336 2.93 ± 1.77
Body Mass Index 115 28.51 ± 5.24 342 27.72 ± 5.18
POP-Q Stage 115 341
    II 32 (28%) 101 (30%)
    III 73 (63%) 213 (62%)
    IV 10 (9%) 27 (8%)
POP-Q Point Aa 115 1.4 ± 1.3 342 1.33 ± 1.44
Preoperative Stress Test 111 327
    Positive 44 (40%) 112 (34%)
    Negative 67 (60%) 215 (66%)
Retropubic midurethral sling 115 342
    Yes 24 (21%) 199 (58%)
    No 91 (79%) 143 (42%)
Strenuous Activity 110 320
    Yes 76 (69%) 226 (71%)
    No 34 (31%) 94 (29%)
Leakage associated with a feeling of urgency 110 322
    Yes 46 (42%) 110 (34%)
    No 64 (58%) 212 (66%)
Current Smoker 115 336
    Yes 7 (6%) 18 (5%)
    No 108 (94%) 318 (95%)
Diabetes 113 334
    Yes 20 (18%) 38 (11%)
    No 93 (82%) 296 (89%)
*

Patients with data available.

SUI , stress urinary incontinence; SD, standard deviation; POP-Q, pelvic organ prolapse quantification.