. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 0 1):279–287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094

Table 2.

Risk factors and their estimated contribution in the logistical model for predicting de novo Stress Urinary Incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling trial (2)

Variable	Estimate	P
Intercept	−2.98883	0.208
Age at surgery	−0.02527	0.037
Parity^*	0.39411	0.098
Body mass index^†	0.94942	0.158
Preoperative stress test positive	0.46057	0.063
Continence procedure	−1.83254	<0.001
Leakage associated with a feeling of urgency	0.37543	0.137
Diabetes	0.56223	0.094

Square root transformation.

^†

Natural Log transformation.

Logistic regression equation: −2.9888276 - 0.025271306 * AGESURGERY + 0.39411295 * PARITY + 0.94942361 * BMI + 0.4605713 * (LEAK = “Positive”) - 1.8324541 * (Continence procedure performed = “Yes”) + 0.37542553 * (Leaking associated with a feeling of urgency = “Yes”) + 0.56222837 * (DIABETES = “Yes”)