Table 3.
Significant differences in means among interventions based on 1-way analysis of variancea,b. Questions were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale coded between –2 [strongly disagree] and +2 [strongly agree].
| Item | Workbook (n=165), mean (SD) |
Electronic interactive (n=70), mean (SD) |
In-person (n=165), mean (SD) |
F (df) |
| Evolution was explained clearly with useful examples | 1.80 (0.40)c | 1.81 (0.40)c | 1.96 (0.23)a,b | 10.23 (2.63) |
| Scoring was explained clearly with useful examples | 1.60 (0.40)c | 1.68 (0.55)c | 1.94 (0.26)a,b | 19.27 (6.91) |
| I feel that I am now better able to monitor my moles over time | 1.53 (0.58)c | 1.60 (0.49) | 1.78 (0.45)a | 10.09 (4.72) |
| I feel that I am now better able to score moles accurately | 1.41 (0.66)c | 1.47 (0.58)c | 1.70 (0.51)a,b | 10.45 (5.14) |
| Overall, the information was easy to understand | 1.62 (0.57)c | 1.72 (0.50) | 1.79 (0.46)a | 4.43 (1.26) |
aSignificantly different from Workbook group.
bSignificantly different from Internet group.
cSignificantly different from In-person group.