Table 4.
Type of AFDC Exit
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
AFDC Recipiency | Emp. Exit vs. Staying on AFDC | Emp. Exit vs. Non-Emp. Exit | Non-Emp. Exit vs. Staying on AFDC | |
White Natives | 0.15 * C | 0.14 | 0.42 B | −0.29 + |
Black Natives | 0.06 C | −0.10 | −0.20 A C | 0.10 c |
Mexican Immigrants | −0.23 * A B | 0.26 | 0.54 * B | −0.28 + b |
Non-Mexican Immigrants | 0.40 *** A B C | −0.02 | 0.23 | −0.25 |
Chi-square test for all interaction effects | p<.001 | p<.05 | ||
Pseudo R-square | 0.26 | 0.20 |
Source and Sample: See Table 1.
Note: These models control for individual and contextual characteristics (see Table 2 for details). The models also include two-way interactions between nativity/race/ethnicity and state welfare benefit level. The estimates shown are the slopes of state benefit level by nativity/race/ethnicity (i.e., the main effect of state benefit level plus the interaction effect for each respective group).
p<.10
p<.05
p<.01
p<001 (slope of state welfare guarantee is significantly different from zero)
p<.10
p<.05 (slope is significantly different from White natives)
p<.10
p<.05 (slope is significantly different from Black natives)
p<.10
p<.05 (slope is significantly different from Mexican Immigrants)