Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 18;156(11):2277–2287. doi: 10.1007/s00227-009-1255-5

Table 4.

Results of two-way ANOVA of OM remineralization rates (log-transformed \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mu {\text{mol C ml}}_{\text{ws}}^{ - 1} $$\end{document}) in the different sediment samples

Source SS df MS F ratio P
Subtidal surface
 Treatment 0.086 2 0.043 49.193 0.000
 Oxygenation 0.031 1 0.031 34.982 0.000
 Interaction 0.000 2 0.000 0.186 0.833
 Error 0.009 10 0.001
Subtidal subsurface
 Treatment 0.214 2 0.107 1,085.722 0.000
 Oxygenation 0.277 1 0.277 2,820.872 0.000
 Interaction 0.001 2 0.001 10.084 0.003
 Error 0.001 12 0.000
Intertidal surface
 Treatment 0.051 1 0.051 44.460 0.000
 Time 0.273 2 0.136 118.734 0.000
 Interaction 0.001 2 0.000 0.400 0.683
 Error 0.009 8 0.001

Treatment is no amendments versus different OM additions