Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;259:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.038

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A - A 4 (Day) × (Gap) × 3 (Treatment) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant overall Treatment effect [F(2,14) = 7.482, p<.05} in the juvenile period. Specific differences were found between P3 HI and shams [F(1,9) = 3.935, p<.05] with P3 HI performing worse, and between P7 HI and shams [F(1,9) = 14.785, p<.05] with P7 HI performing worse. There was no difference between P3 HI and P7 HI. B – A 9 (Gap) × 3 (Treatment) repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant overall difference in Treatment [F(2,36) = 5.799, p<.05]. There was a specific difference between P7 HI and shams, [F(1,23) = 3.699, p<.05, one tailed] and between P3 HI and P7 HI groups [F(1,25) = 10.085, p<.05] with P7 HI performing worse. There was no difference between P3 HI and shams.