Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 7;281(1778):20132980. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2980

Table 1.

Geographical and niche attributes among sister–sister pairs and sister–non-sister congener pairs. (Ecological and reproductive shifts were scored as 0 for ‘no shift’, 0.5 for ‘partial shift’ and 1.0 for ‘shift present’. Morphological trait contrasts were calculated as |log(XA) − log(XB)|, where X is the trait value of species A and B in a sister pair. Climate divergence is 1 − Schoener's D, estimated based on climatic niche models predictions. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05.)

attribute sister–sister pair sister–non-sister congener pair p-valuesa
proportion sympatric 0.80 0.57 ***
range overlap 0.26 0.13 ***
log(range asymmetry) 1.27 1.74 ***
habitat shift 0.54 0.70 **
soil shift 0.55 0.74 **
growth form shift 0.03 0.12 **
altitude shift 0.20 0.26 *
plant height contrast 0.53 0.73 **
climate divergence 0.62 0.75 ***
flowering time shift 0.20 0.28 *
flower size contrast 0.41 0.56 **
chromosome count shift 0.15 0.29 **

ap-values corrected for multiple comparisons.