Table 1.
Major hypotheses tested with experimental evolution in Caenorhabditis.
topic | key question or idea | finding | references |
---|---|---|---|
coevolution | is there genetic diversity for pathogen resistance? | found for resistance to S. marsecens, B. thuringensis, P. luminscens | [29,47,60] |
does evolution of resistance to pathogens have trade-offs? | an increase in resistance, but reductions in growth and feeding rate | [29,48] | |
does coevolution and local adaptation occur between host and pathogen? | populations showed higher resistance to their own pathogens and genetic diversity between populations increased | [49,50] | |
red queen hypothesis | outcrossed sex allowed faster adaptation to parasites | [51–53] | |
population structure and ecosystems | can ecosystems be constructed? | three species interactions and dependencies | [55] |
is dispersal beneficial in varying environments? | dispersal is beneficial under random extinction, can be regulated by a single gene and can be selected for | [33,42,56,57] | |
effects and accumulation of mutations | how do traits evolve with mutation accumulation (MA)? | fitness, body size, behaviour, oxidizing state and other traits degrade | [59,61–65] |
does fitness recover after MA? | restoring selection, or greatly increasing mutation rate leads to fitness recovery | [43,66] | |
what is the rate and spectrum of new mutations? | many mutations identified after 396 generations of MA by genome sequencing | [22,23,67] | |
do mutation properties differ among genetic backgrounds, species or environments? | different strains, species and conditions do or do not have differing mutation profiles | [23,68–71] | |
mating systems | are males evolutionary relics? | males reduce in frequency under the lack of selection, depending on the strain and genetic background | [16,41,72,73] |
does outcrossing sex promote removal of detrimental mutations? | male frequencies increased under higher mutational loads | [41,44] | |
does outcrossing sex accelerate adaptation? | male frequencies increased under directional selection | [42,51,52,74] | |
does outcrossing sex help retain heterozygosity? | no difference between reproductive modes, balancing selection dominates | [30] | |
do inbreeding and outbreeding depression depend on reproductive mode? | inbreeders showed outbreeding depression and vice versa | [75] | |
how does sexual selection by sperm competition evolve? | competition led to larger sperm and restored male sexual function | [34,76,77] | |
life history | does increased lifespan have pleiotropic costs? | fewer offspring for longer lived worms in one study, but not in another | [78,79] |
is individual vigour linked to lifespan? | selection for good condition worms led to longer lifespans | [20] | |
how does selection affect reproductive life-history trade-offs? | selection between faster generation times and offspring number changed the trade-off | [18] |