Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 7;281(1778):20133096. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3096

Table 1.

Predictor variables tested in the GLMMs. Model 1 refers to the GLMM shown in table 3, which tests sharing and non-sharing samples together (n = 79). Model 2 refers to the GLMM presented in table 4, using only food-sharing samples (n = 33). Model 3 refers to GLMM presented in table 5, contrasting food-sharing and grooming samples (n = 182).

model name score definition n
1,3 sex of subject male subject is male 46, 102
female subject is female 33, 80
1 age of subject adult age >15 years 51
subadult age ≤15 years 28
1 monopolizability of food high food clumped in one piece or cluster 37
low many food clusters, but single cluster is defendable by one individual 42
1 food share yes partners share food 33
no partners do not share food 46
2a bond type bond sharers are bond partners 24
non-bond sharers are not bond partners 9
(2a) CRIa continuous mean CRI over two consecutive quarters of the year 33
2a kin relation kin sharers are kin-related 18
non-kin sharers are not kin-related 15
2a sharing direction receiving subject receives food 20
not receiving subject does not receive food 13
2b sex combination F–F sharers are both female 10
M–F one sharer is male, the other is female 14
M–M sharers are both males 9
2b food category meat meat is shared 13
not meat non-meat resource is shared 20
3 behavioural context control resting or social feeding without food sharing 71
groom non-bond grooming with a non-bond partner 34
groom bond grooming with a bond partner 44
food share non-bond sharing food with a non-bond partner 9
food share bond sharing food with a bond partner 24

aIn a control run of model 2a the continuous variable Composite Relationship Index (CRI) replaced categorical variable ‘bond type’ in model 2a (see Material and methods).