Table 1.
model | name | score | definition | n |
---|---|---|---|---|
1,3 | sex of subject | male | subject is male | 46, 102 |
female | subject is female | 33, 80 | ||
1 | age of subject | adult | age >15 years | 51 |
subadult | age ≤15 years | 28 | ||
1 | monopolizability of food | high | food clumped in one piece or cluster | 37 |
low | many food clusters, but single cluster is defendable by one individual | 42 | ||
1 | food share | yes | partners share food | 33 |
no | partners do not share food | 46 | ||
2a | bond type | bond | sharers are bond partners | 24 |
non-bond | sharers are not bond partners | 9 | ||
(2a) | CRIa | continuous | mean CRI over two consecutive quarters of the year | 33 |
2a | kin relation | kin | sharers are kin-related | 18 |
non-kin | sharers are not kin-related | 15 | ||
2a | sharing direction | receiving | subject receives food | 20 |
not receiving | subject does not receive food | 13 | ||
2b | sex combination | F–F | sharers are both female | 10 |
M–F | one sharer is male, the other is female | 14 | ||
M–M | sharers are both males | 9 | ||
2b | food category | meat | meat is shared | 13 |
not meat | non-meat resource is shared | 20 | ||
3 | behavioural context | control | resting or social feeding without food sharing | 71 |
groom non-bond | grooming with a non-bond partner | 34 | ||
groom bond | grooming with a bond partner | 44 | ||
food share non-bond | sharing food with a non-bond partner | 9 | ||
food share bond | sharing food with a bond partner | 24 |
aIn a control run of model 2a the continuous variable Composite Relationship Index (CRI) replaced categorical variable ‘bond type’ in model 2a (see Material and methods).