Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087011

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the eligible studies on high pre-treatment serum AFP-L3% associated with OS/DFS in HCC.

Analysis No. ofstudies Pooled hazardratio (95% CI) I 2 statistic(%) x 2 p-value forheterogeneity x 2 p-value forsubgroup differences Analytical model
OS
Therapeutic method
Surgical resection7,8,20,21 4 1.54 (1.21–1.96) 35 0.20 REM
RFA19,21,23 3 1.50 (1.24–1.81) 0 0.78 REM
Multiple treatment9,17,25,26 4 1.97 (1.51–2.58) 0 0.68 0.24 REM
Viral infection
HCV infection ≥50%8,9,17,19–23,25,26 11 1.57 (1.38–1.79) 7 0.38 REM
HBV infection ≥50%6,7 2 2.28 (1.32–3.95) 29 0.24 0.20 REM
AFP-L3 detection method
Highly sensitive19,20 2 1.55 (1.16–2.08) 0 0.54 REM
Conventional6–9,21,22,25 8 1.80 (1.44–2.25) 41 0.11 0.43 REM
AFP concentration
Low9,19 2 1.96 (1.24–3.10) 0 0.69 REM
High6–8,17,20–23,25,26 11 1.65 (1.42–1.91) 27 0.19 0.47 REM
Study design
Prospective design9,21,23 3 1.42 (1.22–1.66) 0 0.55 REM
Retrospective design8,17, 25 3 2.27 (1.57–3.28) 0 0.68 0.02 REM
DFS
Therapeutic method
Surgical resection7,8,20 3 2.02 (1.37–2.99) 30 0.24 REM
RFA19,24 2 1.73 (1.10–2.71) 10 0.29 REM
Multiple treatment10,18 2 1.72 (1.27–2.32) 0 0.49 0.79 REM
Viral infection
HBV infection ≥50%7 1 2.44 (1.43–4.13) Not applicable Not applicable REM
HCV infection ≥50%8,10,18–20,24 6 1.72 (1.40–2.10) 0 0.64 0.23 REM
AFP-L3 detection method
Highly sensitive18–20 3 1.63 (1.32–2.03) 0 0.75 REM
Conventional7,8,10 3 2.44 (1.66–3.59) 0 0.79 0.08 REM
AFP concentration
Low19 1 2.53 (1.09–5.89) Not applicable Not applicable REM
High7,8,10,18,20,24 6 1.76 (1.45–2.14) 0 0.53 0.41 REM
Study design
Retrospective design8,18, 24 3 1.67 (1.28–2.17) 0 0.39 REM

CI, confidence interval; REM, random-effect model; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; AFP, α-fetoprotein; AFP-L3, lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of α-fetoprotein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus.