Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087139

Table 2. Mixed effect size moderators of HIV prevalence among MSMW relative to MSMO.

Moderator variables Subgroup categories Number ofstudies Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value Q-statistic(moderator class) HIV prevalence estimate, MSMW (95% CI) HIV prevalence estimate, MSMO (95% CI)
Date of data collection Pre-2000 15 0.58 (0.45, 0.73) <.001 6.8* 15.3% (9.1%, 24.5%) 24.0% (15.1%, 36.1%)
2000 and after 13 0.28 (0.17, 0.44) <.001 19.4% (13.3%, 27.4%) 46.7% (39.4%, 54.1%)
Study locale Zone with high HIV/AIDS 21 0.41 (0.29, 0.59) <.001 0.01 20.2% (14.0%, 28.4%) 38.4% (25.4%, 53.4%)
Other area 7 0.40 (0.25, 0.64) <.001 8.9% (5.1%, 15.0%) 20.2% (10.5%, 35.2%)
Sampling strategy Convenience 18 0.47 (0.37, 0.60) <.001 0.76 20.4% (11.9%, 32.7%) 36.8% (25.2%, 50.2%)
Probability 10 0.35 (0.19, 0.66) .001 11.9% (6.7%, 20.4%) 27.4% (12.1%, 50.8%)
Minority-based <90% minority 19 0.43 (0.30, 0.60) <.001 0.35 13.3% (8.7%, 20.0%) 26.4% (16.4%, 39.7%)
≥90% minority 7 0.31 (0.19, 0.53) <.001 28.4% (15.8%, 45.5%) 56.4% (46.7%, 64.8%)
Behavioral recall window ≤12 months 15 0.31 (0.21, 0.46) <.001 0.12 16.3% (10.0%, 25.5%) 37.5% (23.1%, 54.6%)
>12 months 8 0.49 (0.32, 0.73) <.001 12.5% (7.6%, 19.8%) 25.1% (14.6%, 39.8%)
Assessment of HIV status Self-report 6 0.39 (0.29, 0.52) <.001 0.74 6.1% (1.4%, 22.7%) 15.6% (4.0%, 45.3%)
Serologic 22 0.41 (0.31, 0.57) <.001 20.8% (14.0%, 29.8%) 39.4% (28.2%, 51.8%)
*

Indicates moderation at p<.01.