Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087139

Table 4. STI and sexual risk behavior differences between MSMW, MSMO, and MSWE.

Outcome variables Comparisongroup Number of studies Odds ratio (95% CI) Effect sizeP- value Event rate estimate, MSMW (95% CI) Event rate estimate, comparison (95% CI)
STI diagnosis or symptoms* MSMO 4 0.87 (0.67, 1.13) .287 22.0% (5.2%, 58.6%) 26.6% (8.8%, 57.7%)
MSWE 3 2.64 (0.73, 9.51) .138 17.2% (4.7%, 46.9%) 7.3% (3.0%, 16.4%)
UAI MSMO 4 0.91 (0.58, 1.42) .665 32.7% (22.1%, 45.3%) 33.1% (26.6%, 40.4%)
URAI MSMO 4 0.36 (0.28, 0.46) <.001 15.9% (10.6%, 23.0%) 35.0% (28.1%, 42.5%)
UIAI with male MSMO 4 1.08 (0.87, 1.34) .490 36.5% (25.0%, 49.9%) 34.7% (25.1%, 45.8%)
UIAI with female MSWE 2 1.80 (1.29, 2.52) .001 16.6% (10.1%, 26.0%) 10.4% (8.5%, 12.6%)
UVI MSWE 4 0.61 (0.27, 1.39) .237 43.8% (29.4%, 59.4%) 55.6% (45.8%, 65.0%)
*

All studies included measured any STI rather than individual kinds of STI, except one [42]: for this study, we used data only on human papillomavirus symptoms/diagnosis in these analyses.