Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 19;91(1):186–210. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9841-8

Table 7.

Distribution of city’s poorest women across LGAs compared to private and public FP SIS

City LGA Urban LGA populationa Percentage of city’s poorest women in each LGA Public HF SIS Private HF SIS Pharmacy SIS PMS SIS
Zaria Sabon Gari 291,358 61.69 2.7 3.0 2.0 9.1
Zaria 406,990 38.31 2.3 0.6 2.0 9.2
Kaduna Chikun 30.26 0.6 1.2 3.5 25.7
Kaduna N 364,575 39.44 5.1 16.5 39.6 67.3
Kaduna S 402,731 30.30 12.3 27.6 24.8 244.0
Abuja AMAC 72.14 0.7 2.0 11.5 5.6
Bwari 27.86 0.8 0.7 4.3 8.7
Ilorin Ilorin E 11.98 3.2 4.7 12.8 4.5
Ilorin S 14.05 10.8 15.5 15.6 123.2
Ilorin W 365,221 35.27 6.9 9.5 8.7 115.7
Offa 88,975 38.70 2.4 2.5 2.2 40.4
Ibadan Ibadan N 308,119 19.65 18.5 7.9 54.7 81.7
Ibadan NE 331,444 27.13 33.6 15.6 36.4 219.4
Ibadan NW 154,029 5.94 8.3 8.9 17.5 67.7
Ibadan SE 266,457 25.91 19.3 4.3 12.6 161.7
Ibadan SW 283,098 21.37 15.3 8.3 49.0 70.2
Benin Egor 340,287 25.66 1.6 5.7 8.1 53.7
Ikpoba-Okha 36.94 1.6 3.3 1.5 52.3
Oredo 37.40 5.0 16.3 39.8 161.8

Bold and Italicized values show the LGAs that contain the highest percentage of each city’s poorest women, as well as the LGAs that have the highest SIS for each SDP type within each city

aSource: http://www.citypopulation.de/php/nigeria-admin.php. Population census data are only available at the full LGA level; urban areas are not delineated from nonurban areas. Therefore, for the purposes of this study, population estimates were only included for LGAs that are almost entirely urban. An LGA was considered to be almost entirely urban if the entire square kilometer area of the LGA minus the square kilometer area from which the SDP sample frame was taken within that LGA was <30 km2