Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 9;143(3):493–505. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2828-z

Table 2.

Efficacy results; summary of survival and response rates in each treatment arm (ITT population)

Lapatinib 1,250 mg QD plus vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 (N = 75) Lapatinib 1,250 mg QD plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 (N = 37)
Overall response rate, n (%)
CR 1 (1) 2 (5)
PR 14 (19) 11 (30)
CR + PR (95 %CI) 15 (20) (11.6, 30.8) 13 (35) (20.2, 52.5)
SD 35 (47) 15 (41)
PD 15 (20) 7 (19)
Unknowna 10 (13) 2 (5)
Duration of response, months
Median duration of response (95 % CI) 6.7 (4.6, 8.3) 10.8 (4.3, NE)
Clinical benefit response rate, n (%)
CR 1 (1) 2 (5)
PR 14 (19) 11 (30)
SD < 24 weeks 21 (28) 10 (27)
SD ≥ 24 weeks 14 (19) 5 (14)
PD 15 (20) 7 (19)
Unknown 10 (13) 2 (5)
Total CBR (95 % CI) 29 (39) (27.6, 50.6) 18 (49) (31.9, 65.6)
Time to response
Response events, n (%) 15 (20) 13 (35)
Median time to response, weeks (95 % CI) 9.4 (9.0, 10.1) 9.3 (9.1, 10.0)

aPatients did not have their responses assessed at the 9-week timepoint for the following reasons: lapatinib plus vinorelbine arm: AE (5 patients), patient’s choice (1 patient), disease progression (2 patients), investigator discretion (1 patient), and protocol deviation (1 patient); lapatinib plus capecitabine arm: patient’s choice (1 patient), and disease progression (1 patient). AE adverse event; CI confidence interval; CBR clinical benefit rate; CR complete response; ITT intent-to-treat; NE not evaluable; PD progressive disease; PR partial response; QD once daily; SD stable disease