. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 31.

Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2013 Apr;11(2):193–210. doi: 10.1007/s12021-012-9157-y

Table 2.

Comparison of the change points detected by FCV model and the TCA method. Column 2–4 only listed the number of change points which were determined by visual examination and also detected by either of the models.

	Benchmark change points determined by visual examination	Common change points detected by both models	Additional change points detected by FCV model only	Additional change points detected by TCA only
Sub1	11	3	8	0
Sub2	14	7	5	2
Sub3	10	7	3	0
Sub4	12	6	6	0
Total	47	23 (48.9%)	22 (46.8%)	2 (4.3%)