Table 2.
The comparison of various algorithms using DIP dataset
| Algorithm | Ncp | | P | | Precision(%) | Recall(%) | F-measure(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | 212 | 1246 | 17.01 | 59.81 | 26.49 |
| CPM | 84 | 245 | 34.29 | 25.93 | 29.53 |
| CoAch | 286 | 747 | 38.29 | 58.18 | 46.18 |
| Our algorithm | 192 | 422 | 45.50 | 54.21 | 49.17 |
Table 2 demonstrates the comparison of MCL, CPM, CoAch and our algorithm using DIP dataset. The comparison is based on the number of predicted complexes, the number of predicted complexes which match at least one known protein complex, precision, recall and F-measure.