Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2013 Mar 7;127(17):1793–1800. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001952

Table 3.

Comparison between quantitative assessments across categories of percent diameter stenosis by Clinical Interpretation and QCA. Each cell represents the number of lesions in agreement in that category between the 2 methods.

Pre-PCI stenosis (%) by QCA
Pre-PCI stenosis (%)
by Clinical Interpretation
50 to <70 70 to <90 90 to <100 100 Total
50 to <70 2 (0.9) 1 (0.5) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (1.4)
70 to <90 50 (23.2) 63 (29.2) 0 (0) 0 (0) 113 (52.3)
90 to <100 6 (2.8) 70 (32.4) 9 (4.2) 2 (0.9) 87 (40.3)
100 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.5) 12 (5.6) 13 (6.0)
Total 58 (26.9) 134 (62.0) 10 (4.6) 14 (6.5) 216* (100)
*

12 lesions not compared due to missing quantitative information on stenosis severity in the clinical record

PCI = Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, QCA = Quantitative Coronary Angiography