Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Nov 27;26(1):93–109. doi: 10.1017/S0954579413000850

Table 3.

Family Study: Infants’ Attachment to Mothers and to Fathers and Their Tense Discomfort and Reparation at Toddler Age as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior Problems at 6 ½ – 8 Years

Predictors F Beta F Beta F Beta F Beta
Step 1
C Gender 4.58* .22 3.94* .21 2.77 .19 1.04 .11
R2 = .05, F (1, 87) = 4.58*
Step 2
C Attachment security with M, 15 mo. < 1 −.02 < 1 −.04 < 1 −.03
C Attachment security with F, 15 mo. 1.31 −.12 < 1 −.10 < 1 −.02
R2 = .07, F (3, 85) = 1.98
Step 3
C Tense discomfort, 38 mo. < 1 −.09 11.25*** −.80
C Reparation, 38 mo. < 1 .01 < 1 −.21
R2 = .07, F (5, 83) = 1.29
Step 4
C Tense discomfort × C attachment security with M 4.51* .31
C Tense discomfort × C attachment security with F 7.82*** .55
C Reparation × C attachment security with M < 1 .13
C Reparation × C attachment security with F < 1 .14
R2 = .19, F (9, 79) = 2.12*

M=Mother, F=Father, C=Child. Mo.=Months. Predictors entered as follows: at Step 1, child gender (0=girl, 1=boy), at Step 2, security with mother and security with father (0=insecure, 1=secure), at Step 3, child tense discomfort and reparation, and at Step 4, four interaction terms: child tense discomfort × attachment security with mother and child tense discomfort × attachment security with father and child reparation × attachment security with mother and child reparation × attachment security with father.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .025.

***

p < .01.

****

p < .001.