Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Econ. 2013 Nov 14;110:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.003

Table 5.

Falsification test of rehospitalization rates using pseudo-CON status

raw mean
adjusted
baseline fixed effects model
non-CON marginal effect P value marginal effect P value
Rehospitalization by days from hospital discharge
Rehospitalization Rate for hospital discharges to home health (N=89,989 - 88.2% CON, 56 HRRs)
    0 - 60 0.1709 −0.0035 0.461 0.0002 0.965 0.1%
    60 - 120 0.0896 −0.0020 0.556 −0.0008 0.822 −0.9%
    0 - 120 0.2451 −0.0051 0.382 −0.0005 0.936 −0.2%
Preventable Rehospitalization Rate
    0 - 60 0.0406 −0.0029 0.311 −0.0023 0.425 −5.5%
    60 - 120 0.0241 −0.0020 0.295 −0.0022 0.227 −9.1%
    0 - 120 0.0638 −0.0048 0.223 −0.0043 0.228 −6.7%

Control variables: Patient demographics are age, sex, race. Patient case-mix are 28 comorbidities and 103 DRGs. Hospital Characteristics are hospital type, bed size, and medical school affiliation. Market characteristics are percent college educated, median household income, population, % population over 65, density, hospital beds, SNF certified beds, and Hospital CON. Use of home health by Medicaid, % HMO beneficiaries in the county.

Regression models: Rehospitalizations are estimated with a linear probability model with standard errors estimated based on clustering by HRR.