Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Immunol. 2013 Mar 4;25(2):192–199. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2013.02.005

Table 1.

A comparison of the different mouse models of cancer

Features: Transplanted Carcinogen- induced Germline- GEM Conditional- GEM
Cancers modeled: Examples: All
B16 melanoma
EL4 lymphoma
MC57 fibrosarcoma
Lewis Lung carc.
TRAMPC prostate
Limited
MCA sarcoma
UV fibrosarcoma
DMBA+TPA skin carc.
All
RIP-Tag2 pancreatic
β-cell hyperplasia
PyMT mammary
TRAMP (Pro-Tag2) prostate
All
KrasLSL-G12D lung
KrasLSL-G12D;PTENf/f ovarian
KrasLSL-G12D;p53f/f sarcoma
KrasLSL-G12D pancreatic
Time to progression: (survival time) 0–4 weeks (after transplant) 2–4 months (after induction) 2–6 months (mouse age) 2–12 months (after induction)
Genetics alterations mimic human cancers? Unknown/yes Unknown/yes Yes (some models) Yes
Histopathology mimics human cancers? Limited cases Yes (limited tumor types) Yes Yes
Tumor initiated by transformation of normal cells? No Yes Yes Yes
Timing of tumor initiation controlled? Yes Partially (variable latency & penetrance) No (empirically defined) Yes
Location of tumor formation controlled? Yes (orthotopic) Yes (limited tumor types) Yes (transgenic); No (tumor suppressor KO) Yes (limited technology)
Tumors in natural microenvironment? No (maybe orthotopic) Yes (carcinogens may affect environment) Yes (oncogenic events not restricted to tumor) Yes
Multifocal disease? No Unknown Yes Yes
Track tumor antigen specific T cell responses? Yes No Yes Yes
Restrict tumor antigen expression to tumors? Yes NA No Possible
Regulated tumor antigen expression? Possible No No Possible
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure