Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Aging Health. 2013 Feb;25(1):159–187. doi: 10.1177/0898264312469665

Table 4.

Ordinal Logistic Regression Results for Negative Affect Outcome

Model 1
Model 2
b SE b SE
Prosocial attitudes and behaviors
 Altruistic attitudes W2 −0.143 0.186 −0.234 0.198
 Hours of volunteering W2 −0.024 0.020 −0.018 0.021
 Informal helping W2 0.077 0.132 0.049 0.148
Demographic characteristics
 Gender 0.982*** 0.206
 Age W2 −0.006 0.021
 Marital status W2 0.343 0.184
 Negative affect W2 1.126*** 0.119
Health-related resources
 Driving status W2 0.108 0.236
 Functional limitation W2 0.503* 0.223
 Chronic illness W2 0.101 0.067
Mortality λ 0.097 0.346 −0.169 .375
−2 Log likelihood (df) 1244.71(4) 1096.79(11)

Note. b = slope estimate; SE = standard error; df = degree of freedom; W2 = Wave 2; W5 = Wave 5; effective n = 585.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.