Table 4.
Ordinal Logistic Regression Results for Negative Affect Outcome
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | |
Prosocial attitudes and behaviors | ||||
Altruistic attitudes W2 | −0.143 | 0.186 | −0.234 | 0.198 |
Hours of volunteering W2 | −0.024 | 0.020 | −0.018 | 0.021 |
Informal helping W2 | 0.077 | 0.132 | 0.049 | 0.148 |
Demographic characteristics | ||||
Gender | 0.982*** | 0.206 | ||
Age W2 | −0.006 | 0.021 | ||
Marital status W2 | 0.343 | 0.184 | ||
Negative affect W2 | 1.126*** | 0.119 | ||
Health-related resources | ||||
Driving status W2 | 0.108 | 0.236 | ||
Functional limitation W2 | 0.503* | 0.223 | ||
Chronic illness W2 | 0.101 | 0.067 | ||
Mortality λ | 0.097 | 0.346 | −0.169 | .375 |
−2 Log likelihood (df) | 1244.71(4) | 1096.79(11) |
Note. b = slope estimate; SE = standard error; df = degree of freedom; W2 = Wave 2; W5 = Wave 5; effective n = 585.
p < .05.
p < .01.
p < .001.