Table 4.
Indices of antioxidants damage in diabetic rats treated with NSFO and NSEO.
| Parameters | Diets | Study intervals (days) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 28 | 56 | ||
| Total antioxidants capacity (TAC) (IU/mL) |
D1 (control) | 0.52 ± 0.03de | 0.44 ± 0.01e | 0.29 ± 0.02f |
| D2 (NSFO) | 0.56 ± 0.02d | 0.65 ± 0.02c | 0.78 ± 0.03b | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 0.47 ± 0.02de | 0.67 ± 0.03c | 0.91 ± 0.04a | |
|
| ||||
| MDA (nmol/g) |
D1 (control) | 6.61 ± 0.38c | 9.02 ± 0.29b | 10.51 ± 0.53a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 7.00 ± 0.29c | 5.86 ± 0.20d | 4.89 ± 0.21e | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 7.06 ± 0.27c | 3.66 ± 0.18f | 3.28 ± 0.15f | |
|
| ||||
| Conjugated dienes (CD) (nmol/g) |
D1 (control) | 2.25 ± 0.13c | 2.63 ± 0.08b | 3.01 ± 0.15a |
| D2 (NSFO) | 2.08 ± 0.09c | 1.90 ± 0.06cd | 1.84 ± 0.08d | |
| D3 (NSEO) | 2.08 ± 0.08c | 1.58 ± 0.08e | 1.41 ± 0.061e | |
Means sharing same letters in a column/row do not differ significantly at P < 0.05.