Significance
Physiologic joint loading plays a critical role in the maintenance of articular cartilage structure and function, whereas abnormal loading can lead to pathologic changes in joint tissues. However, the mechanisms by which mechanical loading is transduced into intracellular signals that regulate chondrocyte homeostasis are not fully understood. In this study, we show that the mechanosensitive cation channel transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) plays a critical role in the physiological link between mechanical loading and chondrocyte function. Specifically, TRPV4 acts a transducer of mechanical loading to regulate cartilage extracellular matrix biosynthesis. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in chondrocyte mechanotransduction could enable the development of novel therapies for joint diseases such as osteoarthritis.
Keywords: mechanobiology, ion channel, calcium signaling, TGF-beta, tissue engineering
Abstract
Mechanical loading of joints plays a critical role in maintaining the health and function of articular cartilage. The mechanism(s) of chondrocyte mechanotransduction are not fully understood, but could provide important insights into new physical or pharmacologic therapies for joint diseases. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4), a Ca2+-permeable osmomechano-TRP channel, is highly expressed in articular chondrocytes, and loss of TRPV4 function is associated with joint arthropathy and osteoarthritis. The goal of this study was to examine the hypothesis that TRPV4 transduces dynamic compressive loading in articular chondrocytes. We first confirmed the presence of physically induced, TRPV4-dependent intracellular Ca2+ signaling in agarose-embedded chondrocytes, and then used this model system to study the role of TRPV4 in regulating the response of chondrocytes to dynamic compression. Inhibition of TRPV4 during dynamic loading prevented acute, mechanically mediated regulation of proanabolic and anticatabolic genes, and furthermore, blocked the loading-induced enhancement of matrix accumulation and mechanical properties. Furthermore, chemical activation of TRPV4 by the agonist GSK1016790A in the absence of mechanical loading similarly enhanced anabolic and suppressed catabolic gene expression, and potently increased matrix biosynthesis and construct mechanical properties. These findings support the hypothesis that TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ signaling plays a central role in the transduction of mechanical signals to support cartilage extracellular matrix maintenance and joint health. Moreover, these insights raise the possibility of therapeutically targeting TRPV4-mediated mechanotransduction for the treatment of diseases such as osteoarthritis, as well as to enhance matrix formation and functional properties of tissue-engineered cartilage as an alternative to bioreactor-based mechanical stimulation.
Articular cartilage is the dense connective tissue that lines the surfaces of diarthrodial joints and provides a low-friction surface for joint loading and articulation. The extracellular matrix (ECM) of articular cartilage is primarily comprised of proteoglycans and type II collagen, in addition to a sparse population of chondrocytes responsible for synthesizing and maintaining this tissue. The mechanical environment of articular cartilage plays an important role in regulating the development and maintenance of the tissue. For example, dynamic compressive loading of cartilage supports ECM biosynthesis (1), whereas abnormal loading, such as disuse, static loading, or altered joint biomechanics, can disrupt ECM homeostasis (2, 3) and lead to osteoarthritis (OA) (4), a degenerative joint disease characterized by an imbalance of chondrocyte anabolic and catabolic activities. Most of the hypotheses on the etiology of OA involve biomechanical loading as a factor (4, 5). As such, understanding chondrocyte mechanotransduction, i.e., how chondrocytes sense and respond to their physical environment, is vital to understanding how OA develops and progresses, and may lead to new treatments for this disease.
Chondrocyte mechanotransduction appears to involve the integration and transduction of multiple biophysical signals that arise from joint loading, including direct matrix, cellular, and nuclear strain, hydrostatic pressurization, fluid shear, and changes in tissue osmolarity (6). Ion channels, integrin signaling, and the primary cilia have all been implicated in transducing the external biophysical environment of chondrocytes into electrical and/or chemical intracellular signaling (7–9). Specifically, intracellular Ca2+ signaling has emerged as a common regulatory mechanism for controlling gene and protein expression (10–12).
The transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel is a multimodally activated, Ca2+-preferred membrane ion channel widely implicated in transducing external environmental cues into specific metabolic responses via the generation of intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) transients (13–15). Human TRPV4 mutations that alter channel function are known to disrupt normal skeletal development and joint health (14, 16–18), and similarly, targeted deletion of TRPV4 in mice leads to loss of chondrocyte osmotransduction and subsequently, severe joint degeneration (19). TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ signaling has also been shown to enhance chondrogenic gene expression in chondroprogenitor cell lines (20), as well as increase matrix synthesis in chondrocyte-based self-assembled constructs (21). However, the precise role of TRPV4 in transducing and regulating chondrocyte metabolic activity in response to mechanical loading is unclear.
The goal of this study was to examine the hypothesis that TRPV4 transduces dynamic compressive loading into signals that regulate cartilage homeostasis. We first confirmed the presence of TRPV4 channels in chondrocyte-laden agarose constructs that produced [Ca2+]i transients in response to hypoosmotic swelling and TRPV4 agonist GSK1016790A (GSK101). The TRPV4 antagonist GSK205 was used to examine the role of this channel in regulating the response of chondrocytes to mechanical loading, whereas the GSK101 and osmotic loading were used to evaluate the effects of TRPV4 activation in the absence of mechanical loading.
Results
TRPV4 Channel Function in Agarose-Embedded Chondrocytes.
Immunofluorescence staining for TRPV4 revealed the presence of TRPV4 in the cellular membrane of chondrocytes 3 d after casting in agarose (Fig. 1A). Using fluorescence ratio imaging, Ca2+ concentrations in individual agarose-embedded chondrocytes were measured in response to increases or decreases in osmolarity and TRPV4 activation. A significant increase in Ca2+ signaling was observed with both hypoosmotic treatments (400→200 mOsm and 600→400 mOsm, P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively), as well as GSK101 treatment (P < 0.001), compared with their respective isoosmotic controls (Fig. 1 B and C), whereas the percentage of cells exhibiting a [Ca2+]i signal was the same between the two isoosmotic controls (400→400 mOsm and 600→600 mOsm) (Fig. 1C). GSK101 produced higher percent cell signaling than 600→400 mOsm (P = 0.04), but not the 400→200 mOsm group (P = 0.58); the 400→200 mOsm group was also not different from the 600→400 mOsm group (P = 0.15). While both hypoosmotic and GSK101 treatments caused more cells to signal, GSK101 treatment generated more [Ca2+]i transients in signaling cells than the two hypoosmotic treatments (Fig. 1D, P < 0.05). Preincubation with the TRPV4 inhibitor GSK205 inhibited the effect of hypotonic loading (600→400 mOsm and 400→200 mOsm), as well as that of GSK101 treatment, and returned the percent of cells signaling back to control levels (400→200 mOsm+GSK205 vs. 400→400 mOsm: P = 0.08; 600→400 mOsm+GSK205 vs. 600→600 mOsm: P = 0.49; GSK101+GSK205 vs. 400→400 mOsm: P = 0.29). Neither hyperosmotic loading condition tested (200→400 mOsm, 400→600 mOsm) significantly affected the percentage of cells signaling compared with the 400→400 mOsm control, indicating that TRPV4 activation is specific to hypoosmotic loading, and that signaling occurs in response to relative, and not absolute, changes in external osmolarity.
Fig. 1.
TRPV4 function in agarose-embedded chondrocytes. (A) Positive labeling of TRPV4 in agarose-embedded chondrocytes (i) and no labeling in the no primary control (ii); scale bar, 10 μm. (B) Confocal images of a chondrocyte signaling in response to GSK101 (arrow), indicated by the increased ratio of green:red fluorescence post-GSK101 incubation; scale bar, 15 μm. (C) Representative Ca2+ traces for conditions that demonstrate significant [Ca2+]i signaling compared with the isoosmotic control. (D) Percentage of cells responding to the below osmotic and chemical conditions. Data not sharing a common superscript letter indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05). Bars do not have error bars because the percent responding metric does not have an error associated with it. Numbers inside the bars are the total of number of cells in each group. (E) Average number of peaks elicited by a signaling cell during the imaging period. *P < 0.05 vs. other groups, n = 5–6, mean ± SEM.
TRPV4 Inhibition During Dynamic Loading Inhibits Mechanically Regulated Gene Expression.
Chondrocyte-laden constructs were cultured for 2 wk before loading to allow a neopericellular matrix to form (Fig. S1 A and B), which is thought to be an important structure for the transduction of mechanical signals (5, 22, 23). Constructs were dynamically loaded for 3 h, both in the presence and absence of GSK205, following which the media was changed and constructs collected for RNA extraction 24 and 72 h later. Transient GSK205 exposure alone had no effect on gene expression levels (Fig. 2A). ACAN gene expression was not significantly affected by loading (24 h: P = 0.34; 72 h: P = 0.25), nor was COL2α1 (24 h: P = 0.84; 72 h: P = 0.60). However, 72 h later Loading+GSK205 caused a decrease in COL2α1 (P < 0.01) and an increase in NOS2 (P = 0.02) gene expression compared with control, an effect that was not present with loading alone. In addition, ADAMTS5 expression was decreased with loading 72 h after loading (P < 0.001) and this effect was partially attenuated by GSK205 (loaded vs. loaded + GSK205: P < 0.01). Loading and GSK205 treatment had no effect on SOX9 gene expression; however, TGF-β3 expression was significantly increased at 24 h (P < 0.01) with loading and this effect was fully blocked by GSK205 (control vs. loaded + GSK205: P = 0.78). This effect was also transient, as TGF-β3 expression in the loaded group returned to control levels by 72 h. The anabolic and anti-inflammatory effect of mechanical loading on chondrocyte gene expression was also dependent on the 2-wk preculture period; when chondrocyte-laden constructs were loaded on day 0 (3 d after casting), ACAN and COL2α1 gene expression was suppressed and inflammatory genes ADAMTS5 and NOS2 were highly up-regulated (Fig. S1).
Fig. 2.
TRPV4-dependent gene expression in 2-wk precultured chondrocyte-laden agarose constructs 24 and 72 h after mechanical loading. No change in (A) ACAN or (E) SOX9 gene expression was observed. Mechanical loading enhanced TGF-β3 (F) and suppressed ADAMTS5 gene expression (D) in a TRPV4-dependent manner. Inhibition of TRPV4 during mechanical loading also enhanced NOS2 (C) and suppressed COL2α1 (B) gene expression. *greater than all other groups (P < 0.05); #smaller than all other groups (P < 0.05); **less than control and GSK205, greater than Loaded+GSK205 (P < 0.05), n = 4–6, mean ± SEM.
TRPV4 Inhibition During Dynamic Loading Inhibits Mechanically Regulated Enhancement of Matrix Accumulation and Functional Properties.
To determine if the enhancement of construct biochemical and functional properties in response to dynamic loading was also TRPV4-dependent, precultured constructs underwent daily dynamic compressive loading for 4 wk (3 h/d, 5 d/wk), in the presence or absence of GSK205. Daily transient exposure to GSK205 had no effect on construct wet weight, biochemical content, or functional properties after 4 wk of culture (Fig. 3A). Dynamic loading significantly increased matrix accumulation as evidenced by the wet weight of the constructs (P < 0.001). Furthermore, inhibition of TRPV4 with GSK205 attenuated this response (Fig. 3A). Loaded disks also exhibited an increase in both total sulfated glycosaminoglycan (s-GAG) content (P = 0.01) and total collagen content (P < 0.01), whereas the presence of GSK205 prevented these increases (Fig. 3 C and D). Loaded disks also exhibited an increased dynamic modulus over free-swelling controls (P = 0.02), whereas loaded disks exposed to GSK205 had a significantly lower dynamic modulus than all other groups (Fig. 3F). In addition, although dynamic loading did not significantly affect the equilibrium Young’s modulus of the constructs, the addition of GSK205 during loading significantly decreased this property (Fig. 3E, P < 0.001).
Fig. 3.
TRPV4 antagonist GSK205 blocks the biosynthetic response of chondrocyte-laden constructs to dynamic mechanical loading. (A) Wet weight, (B) DNA content, (C) total s-GAG, (D) total collagen, (E) Young’s modulus, and (F) dynamic modulus of constructs following 4 wk of mechanical loading. *greater than all other groups (P < 0.05); **greater than GSK205 (P < 0.05); ***smaller than all other groups (P < 0.05), n = 3–4, mean ± SEM.
Direct Activation of TRPV4 Potently Drives Gene Expression, Biochemical, and Functional Changes Analogous To Dynamic Loading.
To measure the direct effects of TRPV4 channel activation on chondrocyte gene expression, chondrocyte-laden constructs were transiently exposed to TRPV4 agonist GSK1016790A (GSK101). Similar to the effects of dynamic loading, NOS2 (P < 0.05) and ADAMTS5 (P < 0.01) gene expression were reduced 72 h after treatment with GSK101 (Fig. 4). TGF-β3 gene expression was elevated 24-h posttreatment (P < 0.001), whereas GSK101 had no effect on ACAN (24 h: P = 0.61; 72 h: P = 0.18) and SOX9 gene expression (24 h: P = 0.50; 72 h: P = 0.94). COL2α1 (72 h) gene expression was also enhanced with GSK101 treatment (P = 0.001).
Fig. 4.
TRPV4-dependent gene expression in 2-wk precultured chondrocyte-laden agarose constructs 24 and 72 h following TRPV4 agonist GSK101 treatment. GSK101 enhanced (B) COL2α1 and (F) TGF-β3 and decreased (C) NOS2 (D) and ADAMTS5 gene expression, with no effect on (A) ACAN and (E) SOX9 expression. *greater than control (P < 0.05), n = 4–6, mean ± SEM.
In addition to direct activation of TRPV4 using GSK101, we also examined the effects of osmotic loading as an alternative approach for activating TRPV4 and enhancing ECM production. We compared four different osmotic loading regimes (see SI Materials and Methods for details) and found that after 2 wk, both a +200-mOsm and −200-mOsm quasistatic stimulus enhanced total s-GAG accumulation (Fig. S2). We next compared this directly to 4 wk of daily GSK101 treatment, where we found GSK101 to be a more potent stimulus of matrix accumulation and functional property enhancement (Fig. 5). At both day 14 and day 28, daily GSK101 treatment caused an increase in wet weight and DNA per disk, as well as total s-GAG and collagen accumulation. When normalized to DNA content, s-GAG/DNA increased significantly with GSK101 treatment (P = 0.001), as did collagen–DNA (P = 0.05). Histologic staining for s-GAG and type II collagen further indicated an enhanced accumulation of both ECM components with GSK101. Agonist treatment also enhanced both the Young’s (P = 0.02) and dynamic modulus (P < 0.001).
Fig. 5.
TRPV4 activation via daily osmotic loading or GSK101 enhances extracellular matrix accumulation. (A) Wet weight, (B) DNA content, (C) total s-GAG, (D) s-GAG/DNA, (E) total collagen, (F) total collagen–DNA, (G) Young’s modulus, and (H) dynamic modulus of constructs following 2 and 4 wk of stimulation. (I) Gross morphology, Safranin-O, and collagen type II immunostaining after 4 wk of culture; scale bar, 2 mm. Data not sharing a common superscript letter indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05), n = 6–8, mean ± SEM.
Discussion
Our results confirm the hypothesis that TRPV4 channel activation plays a critical role in the mechanoregulation of chondrocyte physiology and matrix metabolism in response to dynamic compressive loading. This study revealed a TRPV4-dependent response of chondrocytes to mechanical stimulation, involving transcriptional induction of anabolic growth factor gene expression and inhibition of proinflammatory mediators. This response was functionally validated in long-term culture, where inhibition of TRPV4 prevented mechanically induced chondrocyte ECM biosynthesis and matrix accumulation. The role of TRPV4 channel activation on chondrocyte physiology was further confirmed using direct chemical activation of TRPV4, which produced a similarly potent anabolic response as mechanical loading.
A compelling aspect of these findings is that they provide evidence for a specific transduction mechanism for an important but incompletely understood response of chondrocytes to mechanical loading that has been observed in a large number of previous studies. For example, compressive dynamic loading typically does not confer an anabolic response in chondrocyte-laden constructs for at least 2 wk (24), whereas the postponement of compressive loading for this same period is explicitly beneficial (25, 26). Moreover, whereas compressive loading of intact cartilage explants can stimulate proteoglycan synthesis immediately (1, 27), the response of chondrocytes embedded in agarose is enhanced with additional weeks of preculture (28). Cell–matrix interactions in the pericellular region are believed to play a critical role in transducing mechanical signals (29–31). Several studies have highlighted the association of preculture with accumulation of a proteoglycan-rich pericellular matrix (22, 23, 26, 32), which can contribute to strain shielding of the chondrocytes (22, 23), as well as the conversion of mechanical loading to changes in interstitial osmolarity (33, 34). The results of the present study not only reproduced this dependence of the anabolic effect of mechanical loading on preculture, but also suggest specific mechanisms involving the conversion of mechanical to osmotic stress, as well as the transduction of osmotic stress to an intracellular response via TRPV4 channel activation.
Ca2+ signaling elicited by hypoosmotic stress or GSK101 in our model system of chondrocyte-laden agarose constructs was attenuated back to control levels by GSK205, confirming that these responses were transduced via TRPV4. [Ca2+]i transients were elicited by hypoosmotic challenge independent of base osmolarity, whereas isoosmotic and hyperosmotic loading had no effect on [Ca2+]i signaling. These findings suggest that osmotically mediated activation of TRPV4 in chondrocytes is in response to relative, and not absolute, hypoosmotic stress. Thus, although cells may not signal in response to the hyperosmotic conditions of compression, they may be activated by relative hypoosmolarity when compression is removed. In addition, GSK101 elicited significantly more [Ca2+]i transients during the imaging period than the hypoosmotic loading conditions (600→400 and 400→200mOsm), an indication that pharmacologic targeting of TRPV4 may provide a more potent method of activating TRPV4 than a single hypoosmotic stimulus of physiologic magnitude.
[Ca2+]i signaling is believed to be one of the earliest events in the response of chondrocytes to mechanical stimulation (35–37). Previous studies have observed [Ca2+]i signaling in response to mechanical loading (38, 39); interestingly, these studies detected [Ca2+]i signaling in chondrocyte-laden constructs without substantial preculture (<72 h), although chondrocytes synthesize small amounts of pericellular proteoglycans even within 2 d of culture in agarose (29) that could contribute to mechanically induced [Ca2+]i signaling. Thus, the effects of loading with and without preculture, observed in this study as well as in previous studies, may be due to differences in the characteristics of the [Ca2+]i signal with preculture, or perhaps other environmental and cellular factors that change over time (24, 26, 28, 40). Although chondrocyte [Ca2+]i signaling exhibits a high sensitivity to variations in osmolarity or volume (41–44), there is little or no sensitivity to physiologic levels of other physical stimuli, such as direct membrane stretch, suggesting that membrane connections to the pericellular matrix and/or intracellular cytoskeleton are important for the generation and transduction of [Ca2+]i transients. TRPV4 has known physical interactions with both transmembrane proteins (integrins) (45, 46) and cytoskeletal elements (microtubules, actin, tubulin) (47, 48), and can transduce a diverse set of environmental signals (49). However, the complete mechanism of TRPV4 channel activation during chondrocyte loading remains to be determined.
We observed transcriptional control of ADAMTS5, NOS2, COL2α1, and TGF-β3 in response to mechanical loading or GSK101-mediated TRPV4 channel activation. Furthermore, inhibition of TRPV4 during loading prevented mechanoregulation of these genes. ADAMTS5 is a previously identified mechanoresponsive gene in loaded chondrocyte constructs (26) and has also been implicated in mechanically induced models of OA (50). Interestingly, disruption of primary cilia, a structure also required for TRPV4-mediated transduction of osmotic swelling (8), has been shown to increase ADAMTS5 gene expression (51). Mechanical loading of chondrocytes in agarose can reduce nitric oxide production (52), and our results suggest that mechanical activation of TRPV4 contributes to the suppression of NOS2 expression. GSK101 enhanced COL2α1 expression, and although COL2α1 did not increase with loading, inhibiting TRPV4 during loading did reduce its expression. Thus, TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ appears to support ECM gene expression, particularly under dynamic mechanical loading. TRPV4-mediated enhancement of COL2α1 gene expression has also been observed in the ATDC5 cell line (20). However, unlike the response of ATDC5 chondroprogenitors, we did not concurrently observe transcriptional enhancement of chondrocyte SOX9 with TRPV4 activation, suggesting that fully differentiated articular chondrocytes use an alternate mechanism for COL2α1 enhancement. Transforming growth factor (TGF) signaling plays an important role in cartilage development and homeostasis (53), as well as the response of other cell types to mechanical stimulation (54, 55). The mechanoresponsiveness of chondrocyte TGF-β3 gene expression that preceded the regulation of the other genes measured in this study, along with its dependence on TRPV4 activity to mediate this response, represents an intriguing potential mechanism for the biophysical to biochemical transduction of mechanical loading in articular cartilage.
Inhibition of TRPV4 with GSK205 blocked the compositional and functional enhancement of mechanically loaded chondrocyte-laden constructs, further supporting the role of TRPV4-mediated mechanotransduction in regulating chondrocyte matrix metabolism. Functional testing of the mechanically loaded constructs revealed that the mechanically loaded disks with GSK205 had functional properties below that of the unloaded controls. Blocking TRPV4 during loading may have allowed for mechanical fatigue of the agarose in the setting of inhibited ECM production (e.g., a decrease in COL2α1 expression) or perhaps increased catabolic or disrupted matrix organization processes (e.g., an increase in NOS2 and ADAMTS5 expression). GSK101 treatment also produced increases in construct matrix accumulation and functional properties, which again could be due to increased production and/or suppressed catabolism and matrix organization. Future transcriptome-wide analyses (56, 57) may be useful in identifying the pathways that drive these loading-induced changes.
Activation of TRPV4 with GSK101 potently enhanced matrix accumulation and functional properties of the chondrocyte-agarose constructs, even in the absence of a preculture period. In addition, matrix deposition in GSK101-treated constructs appeared more uniform throughout the construct depth than in the control and osmotically treated groups (Fig. 5I). In this regard, the use of a small-molecule chemical agonist to accelerate tissue formation may have significant advantages over the use of growth factors or direct mechanical stimulation in a bioreactor, particularly for large anatomically shaped tissue grafts (58), where diffusion limitations or an inhomogeneous mechanical environment may lead to nonuniform tissue deposition. Determining whether TRPV4 targeting can also enhance the chondrogenesis and maturation of human stem-cell-based tissue engineered cartilage is an important next step under investigation.
In summary, the findings from this study demonstrate that TRPV4 activation is a key mechanism of mechanical signal transduction in articular chondrocytes. This finding further highlights the ability of mechanotransduction pathways to have profound effects on cellular physiology and function, as well as the ability of ion channel modulators to control these functions. Further understanding of this process may provide insights into the development of new therapies for cartilage repair or OA, as well as other diseases related to aberrant mechanotransduction (59).
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture.
All cell culture was performed in standard feed media (DMEM-High Glucose, 10% FBS, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 15 mM Hepes, 40 μg/mL ι-proline, 1× antibiotics–antimycotics, and fresh 50 μg/mL vitamin C) unless otherwise noted, at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Media osmolarity was measured and adjusted as detailed in SI Materials and Methods. To modulate TRPV4 channel activity, media was supplemented with 10 μM GSK205, a TRPV4 selective antagonist (8), or 1 nM GSK101 (Sigma-Aldrich), a TRPV4 selective agonist, with controls receiving the same amount of vehicle (0.1–0.2% DMSO) as the experimental groups. To limit exposure to these TRPV4 modulators, every treatment with GSK205 and GSK101 was followed by a wash in fresh feed media, aspiration, and a new feed of fresh media.
Cell Isolation and Construct Formation.
Full-thickness porcine articular chondrocytes were enzymatically isolated from the femurs and ulnas of skeletally immature pigs (∼30kg) as described previously (8) and frozen in freezing media (10% DMEM-High Glucose, 10% DMSO, 80% FBS). Thawed and pooled cell suspensions from at least five donors were washed once with PBS, suspended in feed media, and mixed 1:1 with 4% molten type VII agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) to form chondrocyte-laden disks (2% agarose, 4
× 2.25 mm, 10–20 M cells/mL). All constructs were allowed 3 d to equilibrate before the start of each study (day 0). Media was changed for five consecutive days a week, except for the constructs used for Ca2+ imaging and during preculture periods, in which media was changed every 2–3 d.
Calcium Imaging.
[Ca+2]i was measured in the chondrocyte-laden agarose constructs within the first week of culture as described in SI Materials and Methods.
Custom Loading Bioreactor.
Dynamic compressive loading was performed as previously described (60). Briefly, a closed-loop displacement controlled bioreactor with 24 individual polyacetal pistons connected to a linear stage driven by a stepper motor was used to deliver a 10% peak-to-peak sinusoidal strain (7% offset) at 1 Hz for 3 h/d. Unloaded control constructs were handled and cultured alongside loaded constructs.
Real-Time PCR.
At day 0 and day 14, constructs intended for gene expression analysis were changed to their experimental media conditions and incubated statically or mechanically loaded for 3 h. After 24 or 72 h, whole constructs were stabilized in RNALater (Qiagen) and processed for quantitative real-time PCR analysis as described in SI Materials and Methods, using custom-designed primers (Table S1).
Biochemical Assays.
Detailed methods can be found in SI Materials and Methods.
Histology and Immunohistochemistry.
Detailed methods can be found in SI Materials and Methods.
Mechanical Testing.
Detailed methods can be found in SI Materials and Methods.
Statistical Analysis.
Data were analyzed using multiple-factor ANOVA, followed by a Fisher’s post hoc test when appropriate. Nominal data were compared between treatment groups using the χ2-test.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Bradley T. Estes for development of the custom loading bioreactor and Dr. Adam Moeser of North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine for generously providing the primary tissue. Supported in part by the Arthritis Foundation, the Collaborative Research Center, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland, and National Institutes of Health Grants AR48182, AR50245, AG15768, AR48852, AG46927, and AG40868.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1319569111/-/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Sah RL, et al. Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(5):619–636. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100070502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Guilak F, Meyer BC, Ratcliffe A, Mow VC. The effects of matrix compression on proteoglycan metabolism in articular cartilage explants. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1994;2(2):91–101. doi: 10.1016/s1063-4584(05)80059-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elliott DM, Guilak F, Vail TP, Wang JY, Setton LA. Tensile properties of articular cartilage are altered by meniscectomy in a canine model of osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(4):503–508. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100170407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guilak F. Biomechanical factors in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011;25(6):815–823. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vincent TL. Targeting mechanotransduction pathways in osteoarthritis: A focus on the pericellular matrix. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2013;13(3):449–454. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2013.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mow VC, Wang CC, Hung CT. The extracellular matrix, interstitial fluid and ions as a mechanical signal transducer in articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999;7(1):41–58. doi: 10.1053/joca.1998.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ramage L, Nuki G, Salter DM. Signalling cascades in mechanotransduction: Cell-matrix interactions and mechanical loading. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(4):457–469. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00912.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Phan MN, et al. Functional characterization of TRPV4 as an osmotically sensitive ion channel in porcine articular chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(10):3028–3037. doi: 10.1002/art.24799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Muhammad H, Rais Y, Miosge N, Ornan EM. The primary cilium as a dual sensor of mechanochemical signals in chondrocytes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(13):2101–2107. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0911-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ikura M, Osawa M, Ames JB. The role of calcium-binding proteins in the control of transcription: Structure to function. Bioessays. 2002;24(7):625–636. doi: 10.1002/bies.10105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Slusarski DC, Pelegri F. Calcium signaling in vertebrate embryonic patterning and morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2007;307(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.04.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Slavov N, Carey J, Linse S. Calmodulin transduces Ca(2+) oscillations into differential regulation of its target proteins. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2013;4(4):601–612. doi: 10.1021/cn300218d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liedtke WB. In: TRP Ion Channel Function in Sensory Transduction and Cellular Signaling Cascades. Liedtke WB, Heller S, editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2007. pp. 303–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Everaerts W, Nilius B, Owsianik G. The vanilloid transient receptor potential channel TRPV4: From structure to disease. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2010;103(1):2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moore C, et al. UVB radiation generates sunburn pain and affects skin by activating epidermal TRPV4 ion channels and triggering endothelin-1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(34):E3225–E3234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312933110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lamandé SR, et al. Mutations in TRPV4 cause an inherited arthropathy of hands and feet. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1142–1146. doi: 10.1038/ng.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kang SS, Shin SH, Auh CK, Chun J. Human skeletal dysplasia caused by a constitutive activated transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) cation channel mutation. Exp Mol Med. 2012;44(12):707–722. doi: 10.3858/emm.2012.44.12.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nilius B, Voets T. The puzzle of TRPV4 channelopathies. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(2):152–163. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Clark AL, Votta BJ, Kumar S, Liedtke W, Guilak F. Chondroprotective role of the osmotically sensitive ion channel transient receptor potential vanilloid 4: Age- and sex-dependent progression of osteoarthritis in Trpv4-deficient mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(10):2973–2983. doi: 10.1002/art.27624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muramatsu S, et al. Functional gene screening system identified TRPV4 as a regulator of chondrogenic differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(44):32158–32167. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706158200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Eleswarapu SV, Athanasiou KA. TRPV4 channel activation improves the tensile properties of self-assembled articular cartilage constructs. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(3):5554–5561. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alexopoulos LG, Setton LA, Guilak F. The biomechanical role of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. Acta Biomater. 2005;1(3):317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Knight MM, Lee DA, Bader DL. The influence of elaborated pericellular matrix on the deformation of isolated articular chondrocytes cultured in agarose. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1405(1-3):67–77. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4889(98)00102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mauck RL, et al. Functional tissue engineering of articular cartilage through dynamic loading of chondrocyte-seeded agarose gels. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122(3):252–260. doi: 10.1115/1.429656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lima EG, et al. The beneficial effect of delayed compressive loading on tissue-engineered cartilage constructs cultured with TGF-beta3. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15(9):1025–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeon JE, et al. Effect of preculture and loading on expression of matrix molecules, matrix metalloproteinases, and cytokines by expanded osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(9):2356–2367. doi: 10.1002/art.38049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bachrach NM, et al. Changes in proteoglycan synthesis of chondrocytes in articular cartilage are associated with the time-dependent changes in their mechanical environment. J Biomech. 1995;28(12):1561–1569. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Buschmann MD, Gluzband YA, Grodzinsky AJ, Hunziker EB. Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture. J Cell Sci. 1995;108(Pt 4):1497–1508. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.4.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guilak F, et al. The pericellular matrix as a transducer of biomechanical and biochemical signals in articular cartilage. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:498–512. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Haider MA, Schugart RC, Setton LA, Guilak F. A mechano-chemical model for the passive swelling response of an isolated chondron under osmotic loading. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2006;5(2-3):160–171. doi: 10.1007/s10237-006-0026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mobasheri A, Carter SD, Martín-Vasallo P, Shakibaei M. Integrins and stretch activated ion channels; putative components of functional cell surface mechanoreceptors in articular chondrocytes. Cell Biol Int. 2002;26(1):1–18. doi: 10.1006/cbir.2001.0826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Quinn TM, Schmid P, Hunziker EB, Grodzinsky AJ. Proteoglycan deposition around chondrocytes in agarose culture: Construction of a physical and biological interface for mechanotransduction in cartilage. Biorheology. 2002;39(1-2):27–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lai WM, Hou JS, Mow VC. A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng. 1991;113(3):245–258. doi: 10.1115/1.2894880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Oswald ES, Chao PH, Bulinski JC, Ateshian GA, Hung CT. Dependence of zonal chondrocyte water transport properties on osmotic environment. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2008;1(4):339–348. doi: 10.1007/s12195-008-0026-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tanaka N, et al. Cyclic mechanical strain regulates the PTHrP expression in cultured chondrocytes via activation of the Ca2+ channel. J Dent Res. 2005;84(1):64–68. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Raizman I, De Croos JN, Pilliar R, Kandel RA. Calcium regulates cyclic compression-induced early changes in chondrocytes during in vitro cartilage tissue formation. Cell Calcium. 2010;48(4):232–242. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Han SK, Wouters W, Clark A, Herzog W. Mechanically induced calcium signaling in chondrocytes in situ. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(3):475–481. doi: 10.1002/jor.21536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Roberts SR, Knight MM, Lee DA, Bader DL. Mechanical compression influences intracellular Ca2+ signaling in chondrocytes seeded in agarose constructs. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2001;90(4):1385–1391. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pingguan-Murphy B, Lee DA, Bader DL, Knight MM. Activation of chondrocytes calcium signalling by dynamic compression is independent of number of cycles. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005;444(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hdud IM, El-Shafei AA, Loughna P, Barrett-Jolley R, Mobasheri A. Expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) channels in different passages of articular chondrocytes. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(4):4433–4445. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Erickson GR, Alexopoulos LG, Guilak F. Hyper-osmotic stress induces volume change and calcium transients in chondrocytes by transmembrane, phospholipid, and G-protein pathways. J Biomech. 2001;34(12):1527–1535. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Erickson GR, Northrup DL, Guilak F. Hypo-osmotic stress induces calcium-dependent actin reorganization in articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11(3):187–197. doi: 10.1053/s1063-4584(02)00347-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lewis R, et al. The role of the membrane potential in chondrocyte volume regulation. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(11):2979–2986. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sánchez JC, Danks TA, Wilkins RJ. Mechanisms involved in the increase in intracellular calcium following hypotonic shock in bovine articular chondrocytes. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2003;22(4):487–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Matthews BD, et al. Ultra-rapid activation of TRPV4 ion channels by mechanical forces applied to cell surface beta1 integrins. Integr Biol (Camb) 2010;2(9):435–442. doi: 10.1039/c0ib00034e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thodeti CK, et al. TRPV4 channels mediate cyclic strain-induced endothelial cell reorientation through integrin-to-integrin signaling. Circ Res. 2009;104(9):1123–1130. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goswami C, Kuhn J, Heppenstall PA, Hucho T. Importance of non-selective cation channel TRPV4 interaction with cytoskeleton and their reciprocal regulations in cultured cells. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(7):e11654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Suzuki M, Hirao A, Mizuno A. Microtubule-associated [corrected] protein 7 increases the membrane expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) J Biol Chem. 2003;278(51):51448–51453. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M308212200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nilius B, Vriens J, Prenen J, Droogmans G, Voets T. TRPV4 calcium entry channel: A paradigm for gating diversity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;286(2):C195–C205. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00365.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Burleigh A, et al. Joint immobilization prevents murine osteoarthritis and reveals the highly mechanosensitive nature of protease expression in vivo. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(7):2278–2288. doi: 10.1002/art.34420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chang CF, Ramaswamy G, Serra R. Depletion of primary cilia in articular chondrocytes results in reduced Gli3 repressor to activator ratio, increased Hedgehog signaling, and symptoms of early osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(2):152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee DA, Noguchi T, Frean SP, Lees P, Bader DL. The influence of mechanical loading on isolated chondrocytes seeded in agarose constructs. Biorheology. 2000;37(1-2):149–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bush JR, Beier F. TGF-β and osteoarthritis—the good and the bad. Nat Med. 2013;19(6):667–669. doi: 10.1038/nm.3228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Walshe TE, dela Paz NG, D’Amore PA. The role of shear-induced transforming growth factor-β signaling in the endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(11):2608–2617. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Huang CY, Reuben PM, Cheung HS. Temporal expression patterns and corresponding protein inductions of early responsive genes in rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells under cyclic compressive loading. Stem Cells. 2005;23(8):1113–1121. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Huang AH, Stein A, Mauck RL. Evaluation of the complex transcriptional topography of mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(9):2699–2708. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lewis R, May H, Mobasheri A, Barrett-Jolley R. Chondrocyte channel transcriptomics: Do microarray data fit with expression and functional data? Channels (Austin) 2013;7(6) doi: 10.4161/chan.26071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.O’Conor CJ, Case N, Guilak F. Mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;4(4):61. doi: 10.1186/scrt211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ingber DE. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med. 2003;35(8):564–577. doi: 10.1080/07853890310016333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.McNulty AL, Estes BT, Wilusz RE, Weinberg JB, Guilak F. Dynamic loading enhances integrative meniscal repair in the presence of interleukin-1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(6):830–838. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





