Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 8;2014:573249. doi: 10.1155/2014/573249

(b)

Method 1 Method 2 N ICC Difference Paired Student's t-test Wilcoxon CV (%) Bland-Altman
(ICC*) P value P value r (P value)
VIZ3D in situ VIZ3D sample 18 0.878 (0.698) −41.4 ± 68.9 0.021 0.0008 19.9 Pearson: −0.66 (0.0031)
Spearman: −0.39 (0.10)

There was a significant difference of 41.4 ± 68.9 cm³  (P = 0.021) between two methods. The in situ method underestimates the volume compared to the resection-based method.