Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 30;8(3):403–419. doi: 10.4056/sigs.3927623

Table 7. DDH similarities between P. caeruleus DSM 24564T and the other Phaeobacter and Leisingera species (with genome-sequenced type strains) calculated in silico with the GGDC server version 2.0 [66]*.

Reference species    formula 1    formula 2    formula 3
L. aquimarina (2516653083)    45.90±3.41    28.40±2.44    40.60±3.01
L. methylohalidivorans (2512564009)    45.80±3.41    27.00±2.42    39.90±3.0
L. nanhaiensis (2512047090)    14.50±3.11    19.40±2.29    14.60±2.65
P. arcticus (2516653081)(2512047087)    16.90±3.26    20.40±2.32    16.70±2.76
P. daeponensis (2516493020)    62.50±3.67    40.30±2.51    57.80±3.18
P. gallaeciensis (AOQA01000000)    17.90±3.31    21.40±2.34    17.70±2.80
P. inhibens (2516653078)    18.20±3.32    21.50±2.34    17.90±2.81

*The standard deviations indicate the inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets (which are always limited in size); see [66] for details. The distance formulas are explained in [67]. The numbers in parentheses are IMG object IDs (GenBank accession number in the case of P. gallaeciensis) identifying the underlying genome sequences.