Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb;80(3):855–868. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02963-13

TABLE 4.

Relative protein abundances of the enzymes metabolizing pyruvate during sulfate respiration and pyruvate fermentation by D. alaskensis G20 and CycA mutant I2a

Reaction Locus Protein name Annotationc Lactate-sulfated
Pyruvatee
I2 abundance G20 abundance Log-2 Rf (I2/G20) I2 abundance G20 abundance Log2 R (I2/G20)
Ab Dde_0182 GlcD (S)-2-Hydroxy acid oxidase 7.30 6.52 0.16 0.42 NRg Ih
Dde_0312 COG-GlcD FAD/FMN-containing dehydrogenase 11.13 9.23 0.27 2.46 6.74 −1.45
Dde_0750 LdlD Lactate dehydrogenase 14.58 11.82 0.30 20.09 11.74 0.77
Dde_1087 COG-GlcD FAD/FMN-containing dehydrogenase NR NR NDi NR ND ND
Dde_3238 LldP l-Lactate permease 4.23 4.12 0.04 1.04 1.32 −0.32
Dde_3239 GlcD Glycolate oxidase 445.77 441.43 0.01 407.13 508.48 −0.32
Dde_3240 LdhB Lactate dehydrogenase 34.22 31.51 0.12 19.34 11.13 0.79
B Dde_2081 Pyc Pyruvate carboxylase 21.66 21.05 0.04 6.70 6.32 0.08
C Dde_1253 COG-SfcA Malate:NADPH oxidoreductase, decarboxylating 0.40 40.38 −6.67 2.41 47.73 −4.31
Dde_3637 Tme Malic enzyme 8.93 11.63 −0.38 ND 53.20 Gj
D Dde_0240 FumC Fumarate hydratase ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_1254 COG-FumA Fumarate hydratase, β subunit ND 30.30 G ND 28.20 G
Dde_3638 COG-FumA Fumarate hydratase, β subunit ND NR ND NR ND ND
Dde_3639 COG-TtdA Fumarate hydratase, α region ND 0.26 G NR ND ND
E Dde_1256 FrdB Fumarate reductase, FeS protein ND 26.64 G NR 22.28 G
Dde_1257 FrdA Fumarate reductase, flavoprotein subunit 6.38 27.15 −2.09 NR 27.28 G
Dde_1258 FrdC Fumarate reductase, cytochrome b subunit ND 12.55 G ND 34.69 G
F Dde_0473 FhcA Putative cytoplasmic formate:hydrogen lyase, formate dehydrogenase subunit ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0474 FhcB Putative cytoplasmic formate:hydrogen lyase, FeS subunit 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0475 FhcC Putative cytoplasmic formate:hydrogen lyase, hydrogenase, small and large subunits ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0476 FhcD Putative cytoplasmic formate:hydrogen lyase, FeS subunit 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0679 FdoG Formate dehydrogenase, sulfur transferase 0.68 0.74 −0.11 11.37 4.34 1.39
Dde_0680 FdoI Formate dehydrogenase, cytochrome B556 ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0681 FdoH Formate dehydrogenase, FeS cluster 2.85 2.57 0.15 3.07 ND I
Dde_0716 Formate dehydrogenase, TAT pathway signal 35.29 0.48 6.21 114.55 ND I
Dde_0717 FdhA-1 Formate dehydrogenase, α subunit 46.97 2.04 4.53 119.83 0.33 8.57
Dde_0718 FdhB-1 Formate dehydrogenase, β subunit 41.10 1.80 4.51 143.51 NR I
Dde_0812 FdhB-2 Formate dehydrogenase, β subunit ND ND ND ND ND ND
Dde_0813 FdhA-2 Formate dehydrogenase, α subunit 22.38 NR I 128.51 NR I
Dde_3513 FdhA-3 Formate dehydrogenase, α subunit NR 0.36 G 9.62 ND I
Dde_3514 FdhB-3 Formate dehydrogenase, β subunit ND ND ND ND ND ND
G Dde_3028 CooS Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase 4.88 1.21 2.02 97.48 5.38 4.18
Dde_3029 CooC Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase 4.66 0.94 2.32 26.27 2.12 3.63
H Dde_1792 PorA Pyruvate-ferredoxin- oxidoreductase NR 1.44 G 11.71 6.47 0.86
Dde_1793 PorB Pyruvate-ferredoxin- oxidoreductase 3.08 3.04 0.02 8.17 7.74 0.08
Dde_3237 Por Pyruvate-ferredoxin- oxidoreductase 232.69 224.03 0.05 118.14 116.82 0.02
I Dde_3241 Pta Phosphotransacetylase 69.06 67.97 0.02 21.88 26.32 −0.34
J Dde_3242 AckA Acetate kinase 70.66 88.75 −0.33 27.02 27.07 0.00
a

The data presented here are supporting data for Fig. 3. The protein abundance values given in Fig. 3 were chosen for the most abundant isozyme for that reaction, and the locus, protein name, annotation, and data are highlighted in bold.

b

A through J designate the reactions illustrated in Fig. 3.

c

Protein annotation was obtained from http://www.microbesonline.org. FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; FMN, flavin mononucleotide; TAT pathway, twin-arginine translocation pathway.

d

Lactate-sulfate was MO basal salts with 60 mM sodium lactate and 30 mM sodium sulfate for sulfate respiration.

e

Pyruvate was MO basal salts with 60 mM sodium pyruvate for growth by fermentation.

f

R, I2/G20 relative protein abundance values.

g

NR, data did not meet the criteria for reproducibility.

h

I, log2 R was not meaningful since protein was detected only in the I2 culture.

i

ND, no protein was detected in either G20 or I2 or the data did not meet the confidence criteria.

j

G, log2 R was not meaningful since protein was detected only in the G20 culture.