TABLE 2.
Antimicrobial | No. of isolatesb |
EAc (no. [%]) | CAd (no. [%]) | VMEe (no. [%]) | MEf (no. [%]) | mEg (no. [%]) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | R | I | S | ||||||
Cefoxitin screen | 94 | 58 | 0 | 36 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Ciprofloxacin | 94 | 56 | 4 | 34 | 93 (98.9) | 93 (98.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.1) |
Clindamycin | 94 | 41 | 0 | 53 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Inducible clindamycin resistance | 94 | 30 | 0 | 64 | 94 (100) | 88 (93.6) | 6 (20) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Daptomycin | 94 | 2 | 0 | 92 | 87 (92.5) | 93 (98.9) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) |
Erythromycin | 94 | 74 | 3 | 17 | 89 (94.7) | 91 (96.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.2) |
Gentamicin | 94 | 8 | 0 | 86 | 94 (100) | 93 (98.9) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.1) |
Linezolid | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 93 (98.9) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Nitrofurantoin | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Oxacillin | 94 | 58 | 0 | 36 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Penicillin | 94 | 89 | 0 | 5 | 93 (98.9) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Quinupristin-dalfopristin | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Rifampin | 94 | 7 | 0 | 87 | 93 (98.9) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Tigecycline | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 93 (98.9) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 94 | 11 | 0 | 83 | 94 (100) | 94 (100) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Vancomycin | 94 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 94 (100) | 91 (96.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (3.2) |
Total | (98.7) | (98.9) | 6 | 1 | 8 |
Results calculated following resolution of discrepancies after repeat testing.
R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.
EA, essential agreement (MIC within ±1 doubling dilution).
CA, categorical agreement.
VME, very major error.
ME, major error.
mE, minor error.