Table 5.
Comparison of rank changes (RCs) for ERG6 in network training phase
| |
ERG6
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
+ Δerg6
|
+ Δerg11/ERG11
|
+ FL |
||
| Expt analyzed | Rank change (RC) | Percentile | Rank change (RC) | Percentile | Rank change (RC) |
| FLGI10, 1DT |
3795 |
100 |
139 |
73 |
−292 |
| FLGI10, 4DT |
748 |
98 |
71 |
43 |
102 |
| FL GI20, 4DT |
999 |
99 |
99 |
57 |
6 |
| FL GI30, 4DT |
677 |
97 |
70 |
47 |
54 |
| FL GI40, 4DT | 123 | 48 | 67 | 45 | 52 |
RCs were reported for ERG6 across 5 FL treatment experiments, under 3 different training compendiums: + Δerg6, + Δerg11/ERG11, and + FL treatment. Percentile of RC was computed as the percentage of genes with a RC as high or higher than the target gene. RC percentiles ≥95 indicated significant perturbation as identified by SSEM-Lasso.