Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087523

Table 3. Association of the GCKR rs780094 genotype and liver damage as evaluated by unadjusted and adjusted models in 366 Patients with Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Sicilian Cohort n = 197 Center/northern Italy Cohort n = 169 Combined n = 366
Variable OR (95% C.I.) P value OR (95% C.I.) P value OR (95% C.I.) P value
Steatosis (1 vs 2 vs 3)
Unadjusted Model Adjusted Model Unadjusted Model Adjusted Model Unadjusted Model Adjusted Model
Females - - - - 1.94 (1.18–3.20) 0.009 1.43 (0.83–2.44) 0.19
Mean BMIkg/m2 1.09 (1.02–1.17) 0.006 1.08 (1.00–1.16) 0.03 1.15 (1.05–1.27) 0.003 1.12 (1.01–1.25) 0.02 1.13 (1.07–1.19) <0.001 1.10 (1.04–1.17) 0.001
HOMA-score 1.13 (1.01–1.25) 0.02 1.08 (0.97–1.21) 0.14 1.16 (1.03–1.29) 0.01 1.08 (0.96–1.22) 0.17 1.15 (1.06–1.24) <0.001 1.08 (1.00–1.17) 0.04
GCKR CC vs CT vs TT 1.23 (0.79–1.91) 0.35 1.19 (0.75–1.90) 0.44 1.27 (0.72–2.25) 0.40 1.37 (0.74–2.52) 0.31 1.22 (0.87–1.73) 0.24 1.22 (0.85–1.76) 0.27
PNPLA3 CC vs CG vs GG 2.19 (1.08–4.45) 0.02 2.12 (1.02–4.41) 0.04 2.48 (1.05–5.83) 0.03 2.50 (1.03–6.05) 0.04 2.24 (1.31–3.83) 0.003 1.97 (1.11–3.51) 0.02
NAS≥5
Mean ageyears - - - - 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.05 0.99 (0.97–1.00) 0.79
Females 2.47 (1.30–4.69) 0.006 1.69 (0.83–3.42) 0.14 3.98 (1.83–8.64) <0.001 3.70 (1.62–8.47) 0.002 3.16 (1.97–5.06) <0.001 2.55 (1.51–4.31) <0.001
Mean BMIkg/m2 1.10 (1.03–1.18) 0.003 1.05 (0.97–1.13) 0.21 1.15 (1.05–1.25) 0.002 1.13 (1.02–1.25) 0.01 1.14 (1.09–1.21) <0.001 1.11 (1.04–1.17) 0.004
HOMA-score 1.38 (1.17–1.64) <0.001 1.28 (1.07–1.53) 0.005 1.14 (1.02–1.27) 0.01 1.03 (0.91–1.17) 0.54 1.24 (1.12–1.36) <0.001 1.13 (1.03–1.25) 0.01
GCKR CC vs CT vs TT 1.14 (0.75–1.73) 0.52 1.10 (0.69–1.75) 0.67 0.76 (0.46–1.27) 0.30 0.75 (0.43–1.30) 0.31 0.96 (0.71–1.29) 0.79 0.91 (0.65–1.26) 0.58
PNPLA3 CC/CG vs GG 3.62 (1.57–8.35) 0.002 3.06 (1.26–7.41) 0.01 2.49 (1.13–5.51) 0.02 2.31 (1.00–5.31) 0.04 2.54 (1.52–4.27) <0.001 2.15 (1.22–3.77) 0.008
Fibrosis (0–1 versus 2–4)
Mean ageyears 1.03 (1.01–1.06) 0.001 1.03 (1.00–1.05) 0.02 - - 1.02 (1.01–1.04) 0.001 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.28
Females 2.34 (1.28–4.29) 0.006 1.44 (0.68–3.03) 0.33 2.73 (1.30–5.71) 0.007 2.06 (0.86–4.91) 0.10 2.47 (1.55–3.93) <0.001 1.40 (0.80–2.45) 0.23
Mean BMIkg/m2 1.10 (1.03–1.18) 0.002 1.02 (0.94–1.11) 0.52 1.17(1.07–1.28) <0.001 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 0.02 1.12 (1.07–1.18) <0.001 1.05 (0.98–1.11) 0.10
HOMA-score 1.31 (1.14–1.52)<0.001 1.15 (1.00–1.32) 0.04 1.16 (1.03–1.32) 0.01 1.06 (0.91–1.23) 0.43 1.24 (1.12–1.36) <0.001 1.12 (1.01–1.23) 0.02
Arterial hypertension - - - - 1.93 (1.20–3.12) 0.007 1.36 (0.76–2.43) 0.29
NAS≥5 7.83 (3.93–15.5) <0.001 7.05 (3.22–15.4) <0.001 5.58 (2.55–12.2) <0.001 4.43 (1.80–10.9) 0.001 5.06 (3.23–7.93) <0.001 4.09 (2.45–6.81) <0.001
GCKR CC vs CT vs TT 1.82 (1.18–2.81) 0.006 2.07 (1.22–3.49) 0.006 1.75 (1.10–2.76) 0.01 2.23 (1.31–3.82) 0.003 1.77 (1.30–2.44) <0.001 2.06 (1.43–2.98) <0.001
PNPLA3 CC/CG vs GG 1.47 (0.73–2.93) 0.27 0.62 (0.26–1.49) 0.29 1.94 (0.92–4.09) 0.07 1.32 (0.54–3.18) 0.53 1.67 (1.01–2.67) 0.04 1.03 (0.56–1.87) 0.92

Unadjusted and adjusted OR were presented for PNPLA3 and GCKR SNPs, and only for clinical, metabolic and histological variables significant at univariate analysis.

PNPLA3 and GCKR SNPs, when not significant, were forced into the models.