Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087792

Table 3. HLA-DRB1 genotype frequency in the SLE patients and controls relative to SLE phenotype.

n *15:01/alleles other than *13:02, or *14:03 P OR Q 95%CI *15:01/*13:02, or *14:03 P OR Q 95%CI
age of onset < 20 144 36 (25.0) 7.58×10−5 2.47 0.0001 (1.60–3.80) 1 (0.7) 0.4920 0.39 0.8806
anti-Ro/SS-A antibodies (+) 326 80 (24.5) 2.13×10−7 2.41 6.04×10−7 (1.74–3.34) 4 (1.2) 0.6138 0.69 0.8806
anti-La/SS-B antibodies (+) 70 14 (20.0) 0.0591 1.85 0.0628 1 (1.4) 1.0000 0.81 1.0000
anti-RNP antibodies (+) 240 60 (25.0) 1.62×10−6 2.47 3.07×10−6 (1.72–3.53) 1 (0.4) 0.2192 0.23 0.8806
anti-Sm antibodies (+) 220 51 (23.2) 5.14×10−5 2.23 7.49×10−5 (1.53–3.25) 2 (0.9) 0.5478 0.51 0.8806
anti-dsDNA antibodies (+) 603 148 (24.5) 5.53×10−10 2.41 3.13×10−9 (1.82–3.18) 7 (1.2) 0.3916 0.65 0.8806
antiphospholipid syndrome (+) 165 37 (22.4) 0.0007 2.14 0.0009 (1.41–3.26) 1 (0.6) 0.4925 0.34 0.8806
malar rash (+) 301 90 (25.4) 2.08×10−8 2.52 8.85×10−8 (1.83–3.45) 2 (0.7) 0.2655 0.37 0.8806
discoid rash (+) 116 84 (27.9) 5.28×10−10 2.87 3.13×10−9 (2.07–3.97) 2 (1.7) 1.0000 0.98 1.0000
photosensitivity (+) 238 28 (24.1) 0.0007 2.36 0.0009 (1.47–3.78) 3 (1.3) 0.7770 0.71 0.8806
arthritis (+) 410 60 (25.2) 1.44×10−6 2.50 3.06×10−6 (1.74–3.57) 4 (1.0) 0.3336 0.55 0.8806
serositis (+) 161 96 (23.4) 3.46×10−7 2.26 8.41×10−7 (1.66–3.08) 0 (0.0) 0.1477 0.17 0.8806
renal disorder (+) 380 35 (21.7) 0.0015 2.06 0.0017 (1.34–3.16) 5 (1.3) 0.6354 0.74 0.8806
neurologic disorder (+) 130 93 (24.5) 7.01×10−8 2.40 2.38×10−7 (1.76–3.28) 3 (2.3) 0.7219 1.31 0.8806
hemolytic anemia (+) 95 35 (26.9) 1.84×10−5 2.73 3.14×10−5 (1.76–4.24) 2 (2.1) 0.6857 1.20 0.8806
lymphopenia (+) 459 18 (18.9) 0.0708 1.73 0.0708 4 (0.9) 0.2335 0.49 0.8806
thrombocytopenia (+) 180 122 (26.6) 5.58×10−11 2.68 9.49×10−10 (2.00–3.60) 2 (1.1) 0.7513 0.62 0.8806
Control 849 101 (11.9) 15 (1.8)

SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. Genotype frequencies are shown in parenthesis (%). Associations were tested by Fisher's exact test using 2×2 contingency tables. To correct for multiple testing, the false discovery rate Q-value was calculated.