Table 5.

Cause-specific mortality fraction accuracy of computer-coded verbal autopsy methods versus physician-coded verbal autopsy reference standards

Datasets	Test cases	King-Lu (%)	Open-source random forest (%)	Open-source tariff method (%)	InterVA-4 (%)	Average (%)
China	400	84	79	75	N/A	79
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation	400	88	73	63	N/A	75
Million Death Study	6100	96	64	33	70a	66
Agincourt	2900	94	72	38	75	70
Matlab	1600	95	69	59	72	74
Average		91	71	54	72

^aThe Million Death Study dataset used for InterVA-4 contained a sample of 552 cases, in which we attempted to extract additional InterVA-4 indicators from the narratives.