Table 4.

Participation in and response to Sexual Health in Practice training by Haringey collaborative (geographical area) and approximate local diagnosed HIV prevalence

	West	Central	Northeast	Southeast	Haringey Total
Total number of practices	14	12	15	10	51
Approximate diagnosed HIV prevalence (per 1000 adults aged 15–59)*	0–4	4–10	6–20	4–20	6.8 (Actual, not approximate (30))
Total population served (to nearest 100)	86600	60500	78800	45900	271700
Number of trained practices (minimum one trained nurse or doctor)	11	10	11	7	39
Percentage population served by trained practices	86	92	86	78	86
Number of high performing trained practices†	5	5	7	3	20
Percentage population served by high performing trained practices	63	55	66	46	59
Number of high performing practices with additional trained staff	4	2	6	1	13
Number of trained but lower performing practices (of which non-responders‡)	6 (4)	5 (4)	4 (2)	4 (2)	19 (12)
Percentage affected population (served by non-responders) (%)	23 (14)	37 (16)	19 (5)	32 (12)	27 (11)
Number of low performing (of which non-responding) practices with additional trained staff	2 (1)	1 (1)	3 (1)	0 (0)	6 (3)
Total collaborative testing rate (/1000 registered patients/p.a. before training)	2.44	1.27	2.31	2.68	2.18
Total collaborative testing rate (/1000 registered patients/p.a. in last 6 months)	5.08	2.51	10.5	4.49	5.99
% increase	108	98	355	68	175

Testing rates were calculated by taking mean numbers of registered patients in the month of April in each relevant year.

*Collaborative diagnosed HIV prevalence data was estimated from Middle Superior Output Area HIV prevalence map.³⁰

†High performers defined as practices that have increased their testing by over 50%.

‡Non-responding practices are those with no change, or a decrease, in their testing.