Table 1.
Variants | Relative tuber disease severitya | Disease severity (rotted tissue %)b | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (surface bruise) | T2 (surface bruise) | T3 (cut) | |||||||
Common scab | Powdery scab | Soft rot | Pcc c | Pa | Pcc | Pa | Pcc | Pa | |
A380 | 0.19 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 7.22a | 9.03a | 9.78 | 5.37a | 23.71 | 2.37 |
A168a | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 20.44b | 18.15abc | 14.2 | 22.00b | — | — |
TC-RB8 | 0.57 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 15.60ab | 23.29bc | 21.80 | 12.89ab | 16.78 | 3.17 |
A362 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 26.66bc | 12.61ab | 20.62 | 14.97ab | — | — |
Russet Burbank (parent) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 34.21c | 29.63c | 19.02 | 24.42b | 21.68 | 3.65 |
P | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.229 | 0.007 | 0.441 | 0.331 | |||
LSD (0.05) | 12.09 | 12.88 | ns | 10.82 | ns | ns |
—: lines not tested within the specified trial.
aMean relative disease severity scores for common scab, powdery scab, and tuber soft rot were generated for each variant by dividing the mean disease score of each variant by the mean disease score of the parent cultivar in each trial in which they appeared and averaging the result. Common scab data are from [3] and powdery scab data are from [2].
bPercentage of rotten tissues from individual tuber was calculated (n = 12).
cMeans followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different at P = 0.05 using Fisher's LSD test; ns: nonsignificant.