Table 3.
Variants | Relative tuber disease severitya | Disease severity (surface cover score 0–6 (%))b | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GH1 | GH2 | GH3 | ||||||||||
Common scab | Powdery scab | Black scurf | R299 | R422 | TAS1 c | R299 | R422 | TAS1 | R299 | R422 | TAS1 | |
A380 | 0.19 | 0.44 | 0.35 | 2.17 (19.5) | 1.90 (9.8) | 0.5b (1.22) | 0.47 (0.97) | 0.58 (1.64) | 0.33b (.33) | 0.56 (1.22) | 0.33 (0.78) | 0.18b (0.18) |
A168a | 0.21 | 0.36 | 0.67 | 3.42 (34.2) | 1.45 (6.3) | 0.71b (2.48) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
TC-RB8 | 0.57 | 0.98 | 0.54 | 3.25 (27.9) | 1.42 (7.2) | 0.99b (5.05) | 1.01 (3.80) | 0.44 (0.83) | 0.53b (1.19) | 0.85 (2.18) | 1.10 (3.99) | 0.50b (0.77) |
A362 | 0.66 | 0.8 | 0.66 | 2.93 (22.3) | 1.27 (5.8) | 0.97b (4.41) | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Russet Burbank (parent) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.15 (26.4) | 2.35 (16.8) | 2.17a (14.18) | 2.17 (12.67) | 1.76 (13.07) | 1.66a (7.18) | 1.77 (9.63) | 1.17 (3.75) | 1.67a (7.33) |
P | 0.39 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.01 | |||
LSD (0.05) | ns | ns | 1.11 | ns | ns | 0.75 | ns | ns | 0.76 |
—: lines not tested within the specified trial.
aMean relative disease severity score for common scab, powdery scab, and black scurf was generated for each variant by dividing the mean disease score of each variant by the mean disease score of the parent cultivar in each trial in which they appeared and averaging the result. Common scab data are from [3] and powdery scab data are from [2].
bTuber disease surface cover score—0: no disease, 0.5 ≤ 1%, 1: 2–5%, 2: 6–10%, 3: 11–30%, 4: 31–50%, 5: 51–70%, and 6 > 70%. In brackets: estimated tuber surface coverage is calculated from disease cover score using median percentile scores within the allocated range.
cMeans followed by the same letter within the same column are not significantly different at P = 0.05 using Fisher's LSD test; ns: non-significant.