Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 4.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2012 May 30;118(24):6287–6296. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27564

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Models Predicting Local-Regional Recurrence

Characteristics Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR P Value HR P Value 95% CI
Age
 < 50 y Referent Referent
 50 y 0.4 <0.0001 0.5 0.004 0.3–0.8
IM drainage 1.6 0.08 1.3 0.2 0.8–2.2
UOQ tumor location 0.9 0.8
Medial tumor location 1.4 0.2 1.5 0.2 0.8–2.9
LVI 1.3 0.4
Nuclear grade
 1 Referent
 2 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2–1.3
 3 1.8 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.3–1.7
Tumor stage
 T1 Referent
 T2 1.6 0.08 1.4 0.2 0.8–2.5
 T3 2.3 0.2 2.5 0.2 0.7–9.5
Negative ER status 3.4 <0.0001 3.2 <0.0001 1.9–5.1
Negative PR status 2.0 0.005 1.3 0.4 0.7–2.2
Negative HER-2 status 0.8 0.5
Tumor histology
 IDC Referent
 ILC 0.5 .2 0.6 0.4 0.2–2.1
 IDC and ILC 0.6 .3 0.9 0.8 0.3–2.3
 Other 0.3 .1 0.3 0.2 0.1–1.5
Number of positive LNsa 1.0 .9

HR indicates hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; IM, internal mammary; UOQ, upper outer quadrant; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; LN, lymph node.

a

As a continuous variable.