Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;20(7):2364–2372. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2834-0

TABLE 4.

Metastatic ULMS—univariable and multivariable analysis for disease-specific survival

Patient/tumor variablesa N Univariable
Multivariable
Hazard ratio 95 % CI p value Hazard ratio 95 % CI p value
Race (white vs. other) 149/43 0.59 0.39–0.90 0.0136b 0.75 0.48–1.19 0.2254
Synchronous intra-abdominal tumor (yes vs. no) 104/88 1.59 1.11–2.26 0.0105b 1.34 0.92–1.96 0.1320
Pulmonary metastasis 164 2.32 1.28–4.23 0.0058b 2.56 1.16–5.62 0.0194b
Tumor burden (multiple sites vs. single sites of metastases) 38/154 1.92 1.26–2.92 0.0022b 1.18 0.75–1.89 0.4833
Multiple metastatic lesions within 1 organ vs. single lesion 192 1.67 1.05–2.65 0.0300b 0.79 0.44–1.42 0.4332
Chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 173/13 2.91 1.18–7.14 0.0200b 1.29 0.49–3.40 0.6100
Surgery with curative intent (yes vs. no) 90/92 0.23 0.15–0.34 <0.0001b 0.25 0.16–0.39 <0.0001b

CI confidence interval

a

Age, previous hormone replacement therapy, time from primary diagnosis to development of metastases, and extrapulmonary metastases were analyzed and did not show statistical significance

b

Statistically significant (p <0.05)