Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e86789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086789

Table 5. Cox proportional hazard model for OS in KRAS wild-type mCRC patients.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Variable HR1 95%CI2 P HR 95%CI P
Age 0.29 0.92
≥65 1.22 0.85–1.75 0.98 0.66–1.45
<65 1.00 1.00
Sex 0.97 0.74
Female 1.00 0.69–1.47 0.93 0.61–1.42
Male 1.00 1.00
Initial Dx as stage IV 0.14
Yes 1.10 0.74–1.63 0.63 1.94 0.81–4.65
No 1.00 1.00
Primary site
Distal 0.88 0.59–1.31 0.52 0.84 0.55–1.28 0.41
Proximal 1.00 1.00
Cetuximab 0.0001 0.02
Never-used 1.98 1.36–2.89 1.61 1.07–2.4
Had been used 1.00 1.00
Oxaliplatin
Never-used 1.37 0.79–2.37 0.26 1.12 0.62–2.02 0.7
Had been used 1.00 1.00
Irinotecan
Never-used 2.49 1.63–3.83 0.0001 1.99 1.25–3.19 0.004
Had been used 1.00 1.00
Bevacizumab
Never-used 1.26 0.88–1.82 0.21 1.06 0.72–1.55 0.78
Had been used 1.00 1.00
Chemotherapy in stage III
No 1.02 0.67–1.54 0.93 0.54 0.22–1.36 0.18
Yes 1.00 1.00
No. of mets
1 0.64 0.43–0.96 0.03 0.75 0.49–1.15 0.18
≥2 1.00 1.00
1

HR: hazard ratio. 2CI: confidence interval.