Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087991

Table 2. Evaluation results.

WGS typing methods Percentage of concordance Time (Minutes per genome) Reference basedmethod Type of input
34 isolates 47 isolates
Pan-genome tree 65 64 13 Reference free Contigs
K-mer tree 88 89 5.2 Reference free Contigs
Nucleotide difference tree 100 91 15 Reference-based Raw reads
SNP tree (raw reads) 100 91 20 Reference-based Raw reads
SNP tree (contigs) 100 89 5.5 Reference-based Contigs