Table 4.
Evaluation of the E-Health4Uth home safety module by parents in the intervention condition immediately after completing the module (n=541).
| Subject | n (%)/mean (SD) | |
| Reading of the Web-based, tailored safety advice, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
Have read their advice completely | 369 (72.07) |
|
|
Have read their advice partly | 125 (24.41) |
|
|
Have not read their advice | 18 (3.52) |
| Tailored safety advice, mean (SD) |
|
|
|
|
The safety advice was reliablea | 4.19 (0.75) |
|
|
The safety advice was understandablea | 4.36 (0.60) |
|
|
The safety advice was relevanta | 3.53 (0.92) |
|
|
The safety advice was usefula | 3.90 (0.77) |
|
|
The safety advice motivated to take actiona | 3.60 (0.90) |
| Implementation-intention plan |
|
|
|
|
Completed an implementation-intention plan, n (%) | 322 (68.80) |
|
|
Completed a second implementation-intention plan, n (%) | 146 (31.20) |
|
|
Was it easy to complete an implementation-intention plan?, mean (SD)a | 4.08 (0.79) |
| E-Health4Uth home safety intervention, mean (SD) |
|
|
|
|
Minutes spent to answer the questions and read the safety advicea | 14.44 (7.08) |
|
|
Did you think that the time spent to answer the questions and read the safety advice was (very) long or (very) short?a | 3.20 (0.56) |
|
|
Was the intervention easy to use?a | 4.05 (0.62) |
|
|
Was the intervention a pleasant source of information?a | 3.67 (0.78) |
|
|
Rating for the Web-based, tailored safety advice interventionb | 7.28 (1.14) |
aScores on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (most negative) to 5 (most positive).
bScores from 1 (most negative) to 10 (most positive).