Table 5.
Evaluation of the well-baby visit including discussing the tailored safety advice by parents in the intervention condition (n=196) and health care professionals (n=238) immediately after the well-baby visit.
| Subject | n (%)/mean (SD) | |
| Parents, mean (SD) |
|
|
|
|
Satisfaction with information discusseda | 4.38 (0.62) |
|
|
Discussing the tailored safety advice was a valuable supplement to the tailored safety advice?a | 3.82 (0.87) |
|
|
Overall satisfaction with the well-baby visita | 4.38 (0.62) |
|
|
Rating for the well-baby visitb | 8.20 (0.87) |
| Child health care professionals |
|
|
|
|
Total time for well-baby visit (min), mean (SD) | 20.40 (4.51) |
|
|
Time for safety during well-baby visit (min), mean (SD) | 5.70 (2.27) |
|
|
Safety information leaflet given to the parent, n (%) | 170 (72.03) |
|
|
Tailored safety advice present in dossier, n (%) | 209 (87.82) |
|
|
Tailored safety advice brought by parent, n (%) | 51 (21.61) |
|
|
Was the tailored safety advice useful to discuss safety at home during the well-baby visit?, mean (SD)a | 3.77 (0.77) |
|
|
Satisfaction with information given, mean (SD)a | 3.98 (0.64) |
|
|
Overall satisfaction with the well-baby visit, mean (SD)a | 4.01 (0.62) |
|
|
Rating for the well-baby visit, mean (SD)b | 7.30 (0.79) |
aScores on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (most negative) to 5 (most positive).
bScores from 1 (most negative) to 10 (most positive).