Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 5.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;128(12):1528–1532. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.292

Table 1.

Agreement between longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of visual field progression. The longitudinal analyses were performed with total deviation change probability.

OHTS criterion liberal moderate conservative
criterion of longitudinal analysis
eyes classified as having progressed / total 		≥5 locations*
117 / 3088		 ≥3 locations
220 / 3088		 ≥8 locations
72 / 3088		 ≥18 locations
18 / 3088
criterion of cross-sectional analysis
eyes classified as having progressed / total 		OHTS criterion
110 / 3088		 score ≥ 6
272 / 3088		 score ≥ 11
73 / 3088		 score = 15
23 /3088
eyes classified as progressed with both methods /total 57 / 3088 149 /3088 44 / 3088 14 /3088
proportion of positive agreement 50% 61% 61% 61%
proportion of negative agreement 98% 97% 99% 99.7%
Fig 1a Fig 1b Fig 1c Fig 1d
*

Criterion that provided the closest equivalence in numbers of progressive cases to the cross-sectional analysis of OHTS criterion. The OHTS used only cross-sectional criteria and had no longitudinal criteria.