Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 10;2013:865834. doi: 10.1155/2013/865834

Table 1.

Comparison between the PCA and the proposed method. Columns 2–31 are the number of pulsative segments observed by the graders, while columns 32–35 are the scale-ten quality measures.

Subject no. Pulsatile features
SVPa VP_Bb VP_Cc AP_Ad AP_Be AP_Cf SMg QOFh
PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed PCA Proposed
method method method method method method method method
G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2 G1 G2
1 3 3 4 4 1 2 3 4 1 1 3 3 0 0 4 5 1 0 3 3 0 0 3 2 2 1 3 3 4 3 8 7
2 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 0 0 3 3 2 2 3 4 1 0 4 4 0 1 4 4 1 1 3 3 3 4 7 8
3 1 1 3 3 2 0 3 3 1 3 2 3 1 2 3 3 1 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 7 7
4 3 3 4 5 3 2 3 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 2 6 7
5 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 4 2 2 1 1 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 4 1 6 6
6 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 8 7
7 1 2 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 3 7 6
8 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 6 7
9 3 3 4 4 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6
10 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 8 6
11 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 6 5 9 9
12 1 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 2 2 5 6

Average 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 1.7 1.6 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.0 0.9 1.3 1.8 1.8 0.3 0.8 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.6 3.0 2.9 6.9 6.8

Average of two graders 2.4 2.6 1.6 2.0 1.6 2.0 1.2 1.9 1.1 1.8 0.5 1.3 1.3 1.6 3.0 6.9

aSpontaneous venous pulsation within one OD diameter from the center; bvenous pulsation in zone B; cvenous pulsation in zone C and beyond; darterial pulsation in zone A; earterial pulsation in zone B; farterial pulsation in zone C and beyond; gserpentine movements and mechanical coupling between arteries and veins; and hquality of the observed features.