Table 4.
Factors studied | No/low | Intermediate | Yes/high | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Significative | ||||
Only child | −0.19 ± 0.03 | −0.36 ± 0.07 | P = 0.026 | |
Familial encouragement to the projecta | −0.12 ± 0.04 | −0.26 ± 0.04 | −0.39 ± 0.08 | P = 0.0035 |
Child's motivationa | −0.05 ± 0.03 | −0.30 ± 0.04 | −0.55 ± 0.07 | P = 0.000000014 |
Adherence to the treatmentb | −0.04 ± 0.03 | −0.29 ± 0.03 | −0.54 ± 0.07 | P = 0.000000021 |
Compliance to adjuvant therapiesc | −0.10 ± 0.04 | −0.23 ± 0.03 | −0.35 ± 0.06 | P = 0.0014 |
Non-significative | ||||
Recent weight gaind | −0.17 ± 0.11 | −0.22 ± 0.03 | P = 0.64 NS | |
Parents at home after school | −0.22 ± 0.05 | −0.22 ± 0.04 | −0.21 ± 0.09 | P = 0.91 NS |
Dual parents households | −0.24 ± 0.05 | −0.20 ± 0.04 | P = 0.5 NS | |
Social integratione | −0.21 ± 0.04 | −0.23 ± 0.04 | −0.24 ± 0.08 | P = 0.74 NS |
Familial encouragement to leisure activitiesf | −0.19 ± 0.04 | −0.26 ± 0.05 | −0.33 ± 0.09 | P = 0.17 NS |
Data are expressed as change in mean BMI-z-score ± SEM at 9 months of intervention. P < 0.05, significant. NS: not significant.
aFamilial encouragement to the project and child's motivation were assessed by the team using the involvement of the family and of the child in the project (Section 2).
bAdherence to treatment was assessed by the implementation of the decisions taken together (team and family).
cCompliance to adjuvant therapies means that the child and his family took part in psychotherapy or in physiotherapy as suggested by the team.
dRecent weight gain means a weight gain for less than 1 year.
eSocial integration was assessed by the team using the participation of the child in extrascholar activities.
fFamilial encouragement to leisure activities was assessed by the team according to activities realised by all the family out of home.